Labrador welcomes the policy but asks Congress to make it permanent

Raúl LabradorIdaho attorney general, in a signed public letter

Defended or excused

Labrador says nonenforcement benefits gun owners and urges legislation because a future administration could reverse it.

“This is a welcome change after more than 90 years, although the National Firearms Act remains law. A future Department of Justice could easily reverse the ATF’s recent policy. If enforcement resumes, the ATF has warned that unregistered items could again carry serious federal penalties. Until Congress acts, the relief gun owners won in this case depends on the instructions the next administration gives its lawyers. I’m urging Congress to make this change permanent and put it beyond the reach of a future administration.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Labrador Letter: Winning Back Ground on the Second AmendmentNonenforcement policy and request for permanent legislation

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Other statements by Raúl Labrador in this case

Every statement by Raúl Labrador
A SureFire SOCOM556-RC2 rifle suppressor against a black background.
Credit: Tony Webster / CC BY 2.0

Where this statement fits

Was ATF right to stop enforcing registration requirements for silencers and short-barreled guns?

ATF announced on October 9, 2026 that it would stop enforcing specified National Firearms Act registration and approval requirements for silencers, short-barreled rifles, short-barreled shotguns and certain other weapons. The agency says the change avoids unequal treatment under a court injunction covering particular plaintiffs and their members or customers. The NRA and Second Amendment Foundation welcome it. Everytown for Gun Safety condemns the decision as a threat to community safety. The question is whether ATF was justified in extending non-enforcement nationwide, beyond the people covered by the court order.

Read the full case

Source and context

Official statement

Labrador Letter: Winning Back Ground on the Second Amendment (opens in a new tab)Nonenforcement policy and request for permanent legislation

About this source

Labrador discusses his office's litigation, welcomes the policy and warns that a later administration could reverse it.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Labrador describes the litigation and notes that background checks and applicable state laws remain.

After the quotation

He credits the states' challenge with limiting federal authority and says his office will continue Second Amendment litigation.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The matter under scrutiny is ATF's nationwide NFA nonenforcement policy. Labrador welcomes it and seeks to preserve the relief through legislation.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Raúl Labrador, Labrador welcomes the policy but asks Congress to make it permanentDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Labrador welcomes the policy but asks Congress to make it permanent
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6682-labrador-says-nonenforcement-benefits-gun-owners-and-urges

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Labrador welcomes the policy but asks Congress to make it permanent". First published: 2026-10-24. Last updated: 2026-10-24. https://disputeindex.com/events/6682-labrador-says-nonenforcement-benefits-gun-owners-and-urges