Jay Stanley challenges Grossman's digital-ID choice argument

Jay StanleyACLU senior policy analyst

Stanley rejects confidence that consumer spending choices alone will preserve alternatives to digital identification.

Responding to

Consumer choice will allow people to decide where to identify themselves with digital ID and where to remain anonymous.

“It’s a very comforting thought that we as consumers will have the power to stop omnipresent ID demands by, apparently, simply voting with our pocketbooks. If only we could have any faith that will be true.”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)Jay Stanley challenges digital-ID consumer-choice assurancesOpening discussion of Grossman's PBS interview and optional tools becoming requirements

Where this statement fits

Jay Stanley challenges Ian Grossman's digital-ID consumer-choice argument

In an October 22 essay, the ACLU's Jay Stanley disputes Ian Grossman's assurance that consumers can choose when to identify themselves. Grossman, who leads the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators, told PBS in July that adoption is voluntary. Stanley argues that digital ID could become a practical requirement as businesses and public services stop supporting alternatives.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Analysis

Jay Stanley challenges digital-ID consumer-choice assurances (opens in a new tab)Opening discussion of Grossman's PBS interview and optional tools becoming requirements

About this source

Stanley uses the July interview to question whether market choice will preserve practical alternatives to digital identification.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Stanley quotes Grossman's July assurance that consumers will decide where they are identified.

After the quotation

Stanley then cites urban planning researcher Seth LaJeunesse's account of how new technologies can move from optional to effectively required, and applies it to digital IDs.

How this statement is classified

Challenged the characterization

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The subject is reliance on consumer choice as protection against digital ID becoming a practical requirement. Stanley rejects confidence that consumer spending choices alone will preserve alternatives to digital identification.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Jay Stanley, Jay Stanley challenges Grossman's digital-ID choice argumentDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Jay Stanley challenges Grossman's digital-ID choice argument
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6542-stanley-rejects-confidence-that-consumer-spending-choices-alone

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Jay Stanley challenges Grossman's digital-ID choice argument". First published: 2026-10-23. Last updated: 2026-10-23. https://disputeindex.com/events/6542-stanley-rejects-confidence-that-consumer-spending-choices-alone