Lincicome questions the economic importance of alleged egg-price coordination

Scott LincicomeCato Institute trade and economics researcher

Scott Lincicome says the collapse in egg prices fits a standard supply-and-demand framework and that any illegal behavior was not economically important.

“That doesn’t mean necessarily that there wasn’t illegal behavior going on, but not economically important behavior.”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Scott Lincicome on the egg-pricing caseScott Lincicome quotation
An automated egg-packing line surrounded by shipping cartons marked Eggs.
Credit: Preston Keres / U.S. Department of Agriculture

Where this statement fits

Did Cal-Maine and other egg producers manipulate egg-price benchmarks?

The Justice Department and 17 states allege that major egg producers coordinated bids to inflate Urner Barry price quotations. Cal-Maine denies wrongdoing and says its communications did not affect egg prices. The filed complaint and proposed settlement do not resolve the disputed facts by trial.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Reporting

Scott Lincicome on the egg-pricing case (opens in a new tab)Scott Lincicome quotation

About this source

POLITICO published this interview on October 18; it identifies the interview as taking place in the fall.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

In POLITICO's October 18 article, Lincicome says the federal case does not undermine his think tank's earlier skepticism that high egg profits proved a conspiracy. He says egg prices have collapsed almost entirely in line with a standard supply-and-demand framework.

After the quotation

The article then turns to a broader divide between lawyers focused on monopoly behavior and economists who rely on familiar explanations for price changes.

How this statement is classified

Minimized

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Lincicome allows that unlawful coordination may have occurred but minimizes its economic significance.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Scott Lincicome, Lincicome questions the economic importance of alleged egg-price coordinationDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Lincicome questions the economic importance of alleged egg-price coordination
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6185-scott-lincicome-says-the-collapse-in-egg-prices

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Lincicome questions the economic importance of alleged egg-price coordination". First published: 2026-10-20. Last updated: 2026-10-20. https://disputeindex.com/events/6185-scott-lincicome-says-the-collapse-in-egg-prices