ACLU's Ming Cheung criticizes the effort to seize voter data

American Civil Liberties UnionAmerican Civil Liberties Union, through Ming Cheung, senior staff attorney in its Voting Rights Project

Condemned

The ACLU's Ming Cheung described the effort to seize sensitive voter data as part of a pattern of Trump administration interference in elections.

“This effort to seize sensitive voter data is part of that same pattern”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Federal Court Sides With Voters, Ruling DOJ Data Demands Violate Voter Privacy, States' Election Authority · American Civil Liberties UnionMing Cheung and Virginia Kase Solomón statements
The Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building beside a Washington street.
Credit: Voice of America / Public domain

Where this statement fits

Judge vacates DOJ's voter-roll collection and sharing policy in Common Cause suit

Common Cause and four voters sued the Justice Department on April 21, 2026 over its nationwide voter-list policy, under which the Civil Rights Division sought states' unredacted voter registration lists and compared them with a federal citizenship database. In a May 12 opinion, DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel said federal law lets the division obtain the lists and share them with DHS. On October 9, Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan set the policy aside. She ruled that it exceeded DOJ's statutory authority, was arbitrary and capricious, and violated the Privacy Act and the Paperwork Reduction Act. Common Cause and the ACLU welcomed the ruling, and a DOJ spokesperson said the department was reviewing it.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Official statement

Federal Court Sides With Voters, Ruling DOJ Data Demands Violate Voter Privacy, States' Election Authority (opens in a new tab) · American Civil Liberties UnionMing Cheung and Virginia Kase Solomón statements

About this source

Plaintiffs and counsel criticize DOJ's policy and welcome vacatur; their evaluation is distinct from the court's reasoning.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The ACLU announced the court ruling against DOJ voter-data demands. Cheung described earlier administration actions as interference in election administration.

After the quotation

Cheung said the ruling made clear that the administration could not use the federal government to disrupt elections or put voters' rights at risk.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Cheung directly criticizes the DOJ data-collection effort at issue.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
United States Department of Justice

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU's Ming Cheung criticizes the effort to seize voter dataDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
ACLU's Ming Cheung criticizes the effort to seize voter data
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5803-the-aclu-s-ming-cheung-described-the-effort

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "ACLU's Ming Cheung criticizes the effort to seize voter data". First published: 2026-10-16. Last updated: 2026-10-16. https://disputeindex.com/events/5803-the-aclu-s-ming-cheung-described-the-effort