ICO calls the fingerprinting policy change irresponsible

Information Commission's OfficeUnited Kingdom information-rights regulator, then the Information Commissioner's Office

The ICO called the change irresponsible and argued that fingerprinting weakens user control.

“We think this change is irresponsible.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)ICO response to Google's fingerprinting policy changeComplete response and public explainer.
Google's name on the glass facade of its headquarters in Mountain View, California.
Credit: Asoundd / CC BY-SA 4.0

Where this statement fits

Was Google right to stop prohibiting digital fingerprinting in its ad-platform rules?

Google announced advertising-platform policy changes on December 18, 2024, effective February 16, 2025, that removed its prohibition on device fingerprinting. Google cited privacy technologies and advertising across more devices. The UK Information Commissioner's Office called the change irresponsible, arguing that fingerprinting weakens users' control over tracking. The dispute concerns Google's platform permission and its privacy consequences. The revised policy still imposes disclosure and consent requirements, and it does not override privacy law.

Read the full case

Case updates

Will Google change its fingerprinting rules?

Follow changes to Google's advertising policies and the regulator's response to device-based tracking.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Official statement

ICO response to Google's fingerprinting policy change (opens in a new tab)Complete response and public explainer.

About this source

The regulator objects to the effect on user control and explains that privacy law still applies. Information Commission's Office, Our response to Google's policy change on fingerprinting, December 19, 2024, licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Before the quotation

The regulator says fingerprinting can identify devices from combined signals that users cannot readily erase.

After the quotation

It stresses that businesses still need lawful, fair and transparent practices, including consent where required.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case examines Google's permission for advertiser fingerprinting. The ICO directly criticizes that policy change; it is not defending the policy merely because it supports privacy-law enforcement.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Information Commission's Office, ICO calls the fingerprinting policy change irresponsibleDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
ICO calls the fingerprinting policy change irresponsible
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5607-the-ico-called-the-change-irresponsible-and-argued

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "ICO calls the fingerprinting policy change irresponsible". First published: 2026-10-12. Last updated: 2026-10-12. https://disputeindex.com/events/5607-the-ico-called-the-change-irresponsible-and-argued