Stephen Ramsbottom says he has had to "build my own case for everything"

Stephen RamsbottomU.S. Army major wounded in the Port Shuaiba strike, speaking to the AP

Maj. Stephen Ramsbottom, who had shrapnel removed from his head after the strike, told the AP that he had had to build his own case for everything in his medical care.

“I’ve had to build my own case for everything”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Soldiers seriously wounded in Iranian drone strike tell AP the military's medical system failed them · Associated PressOpening on Lt. Col. Arturo Lincón; Maj. Stephen Ramsbottom on MRI results; CWO4 Rodney Bearman on the cargo flight and Landstuhl; the Pentagon statement on evaluation and admission; Maj. Billy Key on specialized care.
A U.S. Army logistics vessel arrives at Port Shuaiba, Kuwait, at night.
Credit: Spc. Dakota Vanidestine / U.S. Army Reserve

Where this statement fits

Did the military fail the troops wounded in the March 1 Iranian drone strike at Port Shuaiba?

On March 1, 2026, an Iranian drone struck a U.S. Army tactical operations center at Port Shuaiba, Kuwait, killing six soldiers of the Army Reserve's 103rd Sustainment Command and wounding dozens more. The next day Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described the drone as a "squirter" that made its way through air defenses and hit a fortified building. Survivors have since told CBS News and the Associated Press that the post had no defense against drones, that commanders had been warned, and that wounded soldiers waited days to be evacuated, were not recorded as combat wounded on arrival at Landstuhl and waited weeks or months for brain-injury care. The Pentagon says wounded troops are evaluated and may be admitted based on the severity of their injuries, the Army has rejected claims that it downplayed injuries, and the Army has not released its completed investigation. Democratic lawmakers have asked for answers. The dispute is over whether the military failed the troops at Port Shuaiba in how it protected them and how it cared for and documented the wounded.

Read the full case

Case updates

Waiting on the Army's Port Shuaiba findings?

Get an email if the Army releases its Port Shuaiba investigation, or if the Pentagon answers lawmakers' questions about protection and care for the wounded.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Reporting

Soldiers seriously wounded in Iranian drone strike tell AP the military's medical system failed them (opens in a new tab) · Associated PressOpening on Lt. Col. Arturo Lincón; Maj. Stephen Ramsbottom on MRI results; CWO4 Rodney Bearman on the cargo flight and Landstuhl; the Pentagon statement on evaluation and admission; Maj. Billy Key on specialized care.

About this source

Associated Press report in which nine wounded service members spoke on the record about their medical care after the March 1 strike. It reports that the Army and the Pentagon declined to comment on the AP's reporting, quotes a Pentagon statement that wounded troops are evaluated and may be admitted based on severity according to physicians who follow "healthcare-industry practices," and quotes a Pentagon official on Landstuhl's mission.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The AP reported that Ramsbottom, who had shrapnel removed from his head, said he waited over four months to receive his MRI results.

After the quotation

He added that it was "very frustrating".

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case asks whether the military failed the troops wounded in the March 1 drone strike at Port Shuaiba, in protecting them and in caring for them afterward. Ramsbottom, who the AP reports waited over four months for his MRI results, says he has had to "build my own case for everything". That criticizes his care after the strike, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional; it loses because he credits no part of the care he received.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Steitz calls for an Army explanation of protection failures

Danielle Steitz

“Commanders owe a fundamental duty of care to their soldiers when it comes to force protection; while soldiers understand that they may be ordered into harm’s way to achieve a mission objective, it is incumbent upon commanders to avoid exposing them to unnecessary risk. The Army owes these soldiers and their families a clear-eyed assessment of what went wrong, why force protection warnings and intelligence assessments were disregarded, and why soldiers whose critical work reportedly required them to be within range of Iranian attacks were not adequately prepared or protected.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Stephen Ramsbottom, Stephen Ramsbottom says he has had to "build my own case for everything"Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Stephen Ramsbottom says he has had to "build my own case for everything"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5485-maj-stephen-ramsbottom-who-had-shrapnel-removed-from

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Stephen Ramsbottom says he has had to "build my own case for everything"". First published: 2026-10-11. Last updated: 2026-10-11. https://disputeindex.com/events/5485-maj-stephen-ramsbottom-who-had-shrapnel-removed-from