South Windsor Deputy Mayor Andrew Paterna says the vote is about "a system that is becoming more and more invasive"

Andrew PaternaSouth Windsor deputy mayor

South Windsor Deputy Mayor Andrew Paterna said the move to remove the cameras is not about distrusting the town's police department but about a system that is becoming more and more invasive. CT Insider reported that most council members expressed support for the police department but said they were more concerned about mass surveillance.

“This is not about not trusting our police department, but it is about a system that is becoming more and more invasive”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)South Windsor public hearing minutes on removal of Flock cameras, October 5, 2026Pages 1-2: October 5 hearing, public testimony and closing time

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)South Windsor votes to end Flock contract, remove license plate readers

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)South Windsor deactivates Flock cameras after vote to end license plate reader programOpening paragraphs and Kristian Lindstrom's October 7 statement
A Flock Safety automated license plate reader mounted below a solar panel.
Credit: Tony Webster / CC BY 4.0

Where this statement fits

Was South Windsor right to remove its Flock cameras?

South Windsor's council voted 6-3 on October 5, 2026 to end its Flock camera program. Mayor Craig Zimmerman backed removal after losing confidence in safeguards for the data. Police Chief Kristian Lindstrom argued that the cameras helped investigations. The dispute is whether privacy risks justified abandoning the system rather than keeping it under tighter rules.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

South Windsor public hearing minutes on removal of Flock cameras, October 5, 2026 (opens in a new tab)Pages 1-2: October 5 hearing, public testimony and closing time

About this source

The town's signed minutes summarize public testimony. They are not a verbatim transcript or the council's final roll-call record.

Reporting

South Windsor votes to end Flock contract, remove license plate readers (opens in a new tab)

About this source

Reports the October 5 council vote and quotes officials explaining their votes.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

South Windsor deactivates Flock cameras after vote to end license plate reader program (opens in a new tab)Opening paragraphs and Kristian Lindstrom's October 7 statement

About this source

Police confirm contract termination and deactivation. The report also includes Flock's response through Courtney Terlecki.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

CT Insider reported that, after a public hearing at which no member of the public spoke in favor of the cameras, most council members said they supported the police department but were more concerned about mass surveillance.

After the quotation

Paterna added that the most dangerous thing about Flock is not what it does today but that the country is building security infrastructure first and arguing about the rules afterwards.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether South Windsor was right to remove its Flock cameras, so support for the removal counts as Defended or excused. Paterna says the decision is not about distrust of police but about a system that is becoming more and more invasive, which supports removal as right, so we labeled it Defended or excused. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, because he first rejects the idea that the vote reflects distrust of police; he goes on to defend removal on surveillance grounds, so it loses.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Flock spokeswoman Courtney Terlecki says license plate readers have made an impact on solving crimes and that Flock respects South Windsor's and other communities' authority to decide

Flock Safety

“We know that (license plate readers) have made a real impact on Connecticut agencies’ ability to solve crimes, especially involving violent crime, missing people, or fleeing suspects ... We respect Connecticut communities’ authority to make decisions about public safety technology, and we will continue listening to the community, answering questions, and working with lawmakers”
Read statement

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
South Windsor Deputy Mayor Andrew Paterna says the vote is about "a system that is becoming more and more invasive"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5458-south-windsor-deputy-mayor-andrew-paterna-said-the

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "South Windsor Deputy Mayor Andrew Paterna says the vote is about "a system that is becoming more and more invasive"". First published: 2026-10-11. Last updated: 2026-10-11. https://disputeindex.com/events/5458-south-windsor-deputy-mayor-andrew-paterna-said-the