McIntosh says the 32-hour-workweek proposal would harm workers

David McIntoshPresident of Club for Growth

David McIntosh discusses a proposed 32-hour workweek on Fox Business, Sept. 9, 2026.

Excerpt from 0:00 to 0:49 of the Fox Business video. DI added its logo in the corner.

Video: Fox Business. Excerpt used for news reporting and commentary

Watch the full original video (opens in a new tab) (relevant passage: 02:55 full clip; September 9, 2026)

McIntosh opposes the 32-hour-workweek proposal and predicts that it would harm workers through effects on jobs, benefits, and affordability.

Responding to

Congress should enact H.R. 10323, the proposed Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act.

“Bernie’s idea will hurt the very workers he’s trying to help.”

Original video

Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Could AI make a 32-hour workweek possible? David McIntosh weighs in · Fox Business02:55 full clip; September 9, 2026

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Club for Growth says McIntosh joined Varney & Co. to oppose Sanders’s call · Club for GrowthFirst paragraph

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Bernie Sanders’ 32-hour workweek plan could make life more unaffordable, Club for Growth president warns · Fox BusinessArticle body, McIntosh quotation beginning "AI will make people more productive"
Bernie Sanders speaking into a microphone with U.S. and Arizona flags behind him.
Credit: Gage Skidmore / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Where this statement fits

Should Congress Enact Bernie Sanders’s 32-Hour Workweek Bill?

On September 8, 2026, Rep. Mark Takano introduced H.R. 10323, the Thirty-Two Hour Workweek Act; Sen. Bernie Sanders introduced the Senate companion, S. 5384, on September 14. The bills would phase the federal weekly overtime threshold for covered nonexempt workers from 40 to 32 hours and add daily premium-pay thresholds; they would not set a universal cap on work hours. Supporters urge Congress to enact them as a way to share productivity gains, while opponents predict harm to jobs, benefits, and prices. The dispute is whether Congress should enact the paired proposals.

Read the full case

Case updates

Where do the 32-hour workweek bills go from here?

You'll hear from us if the House or Senate bill moves in committee, or if Sanders, Takano, the White House or other critics make new arguments.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original video

Could AI make a 32-hour workweek possible? David McIntosh weighs in (opens in a new tab) · Fox Business02:55 full clip; September 9, 2026

About this source

Primary video of Club for Growth president David McIntosh discussing Sanders's proposal. We could not find a transcript of this clip, so the attributed quotation comes from the related Fox Business report.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Watch the clip from this source at the top of the page.

Official statement

Club for Growth says McIntosh joined Varney & Co. to oppose Sanders’s call (opens in a new tab) · Club for GrowthFirst paragraph

About this source

Club for Growth’s official post confirms that its president appeared on the Fox Business segment to oppose the proposal.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Bernie Sanders’ 32-hour workweek plan could make life more unaffordable, Club for Growth president warns (opens in a new tab) · Fox BusinessArticle body, McIntosh quotation beginning "AI will make people more productive"

About this source

Fox Business report on its own interview with McIntosh, including his attributed forecast of job, benefit, and affordability harms. Those forecast outcomes are not established facts.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

In a Fox Business appearance and related coverage, McIntosh discusses the proposed 32-hour workweek alongside automation and broader economic concerns.

After the quotation

He predicts losses of jobs or benefits and greater unaffordability. Those projected consequences are his policy forecast, not findings established by the bill text.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

McIntosh explicitly criticizes the proposal and predicts harmful consequences.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

UE confirms it endorses the 32-hour workweek bill

United Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers of America

“I can confirm that we did, indeed, endorse the bill. ... The Sanders bill is in line with our resolution, "A Just Economy for All" ... which "Reaffirms ... our goal of reducing the work week" and "Calls upon the labor movement to pursue a shorter work week with no loss in pay."”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: David McIntosh, McIntosh says the 32-hour-workweek proposal would harm workersDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
McIntosh says the 32-hour-workweek proposal would harm workers
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/515-mcintosh-opposes-the-32-hour-workweek-proposal-and

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "McIntosh says the 32-hour-workweek proposal would harm workers". First published: 2026-09-13. Last updated: 2026-09-13. https://disputeindex.com/events/515-mcintosh-opposes-the-32-hour-workweek-proposal-and