Institute for Strategic Dialogue says the Hannibal Directive has been central to false claims about October 7 deaths
Institute for Strategic DialogueInstitute for Strategic Dialogue
In an analysis of posts on X about October 7, the Institute for Strategic Dialogue wrote that the Hannibal Directive "has been central to false claims that Israeli security forces killed as many or more civilians than Hamas," and to downplaying documented war crimes against civilians. It found that the Haaretz article on the directive was the most shared link in its dataset.
“In some cases, the idea that the Israeli military deliberately killed its own citizens was linked to the ‘Hannibal Directive’ – a controversial Israeli military policy that directs the use of force (even if it poses a threat to life) to prevent the abduction of hostages. The Hannibal Directive has been central to false claims that Israeli security forces killed as many or more civilians than Hamas, and in downplaying well-documented war crimes against civilians.”
Analysis
Where this statement fits
Did Israeli forces kill Israelis under the Hannibal Directive on October 7?
On October 7, 2023, Hamas-led attackers struck southern Israel. About 1,200 people were killed in Israel that day and about 250 were taken hostage into Gaza. In July 2024, Haaretz reported that documents and testimony show the Israeli military used the Hannibal procedure, which directs force to stop soldiers from being taken captive, at three army sites that day. The detailed findings of a UN commission of inquiry say Israeli fire likely killed at least 14 Israeli civilians in two incidents. The IDF has said a helicopter likely killed Efrat Katz of Kibbutz Nir Oz and that tank shrapnel highly likely killed one hostage outside a house in Kibbutz Be'eri, and it has defended the decisions of its commanders. Former defense minister Yoav Gallant said in February 2025 that he thinks an order to apply the procedure was given tactically in some places and not in others. The dispute is over whether, and how often, Israeli forces fired on Israeli captives that day, and how many Israelis that fire killed.
Source and context
Analysis
About this source
An ISD analysis of posts on X about the October 7 attack, collected between October 1, 2023 and July 31, 2024. It finds that the Haaretz article on the Hannibal Directive was the most shared URL in its dataset and that misrepresented findings from media investigations were used to suggest the Israeli military killed more of its own civilians than Hamas did. The page was last updated on September 3, 2026.
Before the quotation
ISD's analysis covers posts on X from October 1, 2023 to July 31, 2024. It says misrepresented findings from media investigations were used to suggest the Israeli military killed more of its own civilians on October 7 than Hamas did.
After the quotation
ISD says the Haaretz article on the directive's use at three army facilities was mentioned 16,513 times on X, with a peak in the second week of July 2024, and shows a widely shared post that used it to shift responsibility for Israeli civilian deaths from Hamas to Israel.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is the Israeli military's use of fire on October 7, 2023, under or in the manner of the Hannibal Directive, that put Israeli captives at risk of being killed by Israeli forces. ISD calls false the claims that Israeli forces killed as many civilians as Hamas or more, and says the directive has been used to play down crimes against civilians. It does not dispute that the directive was used on October 7. That rejects how the conduct has been characterized rather than defending it. The closest competing label is Minimized, but ISD does not play down the use of fire itself; it disputes claims about its scale, so we used Challenged the characterization.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseMehdi Hasan says Israel's military should have to answer for its actions on October 7
“A lot of the Israeli families of those killed and abducted want an independent investigation into what happened on Oct. 7, and I agree with them. Hamas clearly killed hundreds of Israelis and committed crimes and abuses, which they should answer for. The Israeli military, however, should also have to answer for its actions on that chaotic and bloody day – and the Hannibal Directive needs to be exposed, once and for all.”Read statement
Be'eri resident Omri Shifroni says firing tank shells at a house with hostages was not a moral decision
“I think it was not the right decision, not a good decision and not moral. But I can also understand there was great chaos in Be'eri and there was a lot of pressure to end the event there. I think they didn't intend to shoot and to kill hostages, but when you shoot a tank shell on a house, you need to take into account that that is likely to happen.”Read statement
State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller says Hamas was responsible for the overwhelming number of deaths on October 7
“Boy, it certainly does not, Said. I don't think there's any question ... I don't think there's any question that it was Hamas ... I don't think it's any question it's Hamas that is responsible for the overwhelming number of deaths on October 7th.”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Institute for Strategic Dialogue says the Hannibal Directive has been central to false claims about October 7 deaths
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4907-in-an-analysis-of-posts-on-x-about
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Institute for Strategic Dialogue says the Hannibal Directive has been central to false claims about October 7 deaths". First published: 2026-10-06. Last updated: 2026-10-06. https://disputeindex.com/events/4907-in-an-analysis-of-posts-on-x-about