Tim Halbur says senior commanders knew the intelligence reports before the move
Tim HalburU.S. Army Reserve lieutenant colonel, wounded in the March 1 strike
Lt. Col. Tim Halbur told the Associated Press that senior commanders knew of intelligence about the threat to Port Shuaiba before the unit moved there. "Obviously, somewhere at the two-star, three-star level, they knew the intelligence reports," he said. "We were just told, like, 'Hey, yeah, we'll be fine there.'"
Responding to
Officers told the Associated Press that the generals who moved the unit to Port Shuaiba knew it lacked defenses against drones, and that intelligence officers had warned them it was a likely secondary target for Iran.
“Obviously, somewhere at the two-star, three-star level, they knew the intelligence reports”
Reporting
Where this statement fits
Did the military fail the troops wounded in the March 1 Iranian drone strike at Port Shuaiba?
On March 1, 2026, an Iranian drone struck a U.S. Army tactical operations center at Port Shuaiba, Kuwait, killing six soldiers of the Army Reserve's 103rd Sustainment Command and wounding dozens more. The next day Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described the drone as a "squirter" that made its way through air defenses and hit a fortified building. Survivors have since told CBS News and the Associated Press that the post had no defense against drones, that commanders had been warned, and that wounded soldiers waited days to be evacuated, were not recorded as combat wounded on arrival at Landstuhl and waited weeks or months for brain-injury care. The Pentagon says wounded troops are evaluated and may be admitted based on the severity of their injuries, the Army has rejected claims that it downplayed injuries, and the Army has not released its completed investigation. Democratic lawmakers have asked for answers. The dispute is over whether the military failed the troops at Port Shuaiba in how it protected them and how it cared for and documented the wounded.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Associated Press investigation based on interviews with 13 soldiers, primarily officers, several on the record and others anonymously, plus Gold Star families. It includes the Army's statement declining to comment on specific details before families are briefed, and a statement that the Pentagon also declined to comment. The AP page lists an update on October 6, 2026; the wording we quote matched an AP member copy published October 5.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The AP reports that Halbur and another senior officer said Lt. Gen. Patrick Frank, then leading U.S. Army Central, signed off on the plan to move to Port Shuaiba when Maj. Gen. John Hinson briefed him.
After the quotation
Halbur was among about nine soldiers medically evacuated soon after the strike. He told the AP his care at Walter Reed was "excellent" and that visiting top Army leaders told him the Port Shuaiba soldiers were "the guinea pigs" for the medical system. The blast shattered his right forearm.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether the military failed the soldiers at Port Shuaiba in protecting them or in caring for the wounded. Halbur says senior commanders knew the intelligence reports while the soldiers were told they would be fine, which criticizes the decision to station them there. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because he called his own surgery at Walter Reed "excellent"; that praise covers his own treatment after evacuation, and he also told the AP that visiting Army leaders called the Port Shuaiba soldiers "the guinea pigs" for the medical system, so he does not defend the protection or care at issue. Evidence: direct quotations in an Associated Press report.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- United States Army
More from this case
Read the full caseArmy declines to comment on soldiers' accounts until families are briefed on investigation findings
United States Army
“Out of respect for the primary next of kin who will be scheduled for briefs on the official findings of the completed investigation, we will not comment on specific details, individual accounts, or leaked portions of the report at this time”Read statement
Tina Marzan says those responsible should be held accountable if someone made a mistake
“If somebody messed up, those people need to be held responsible.”Read statement
Billy Key says Kuwait was too close to Iran for the logistics headquarters
“Kuwait was just too close, that’s the bottom line”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Tim Halbur says senior commanders knew the intelligence reports before the move
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4874-lt-col-tim-halbur-told-the-associated-press
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Tim Halbur says senior commanders knew the intelligence reports before the move". First published: 2026-10-06. Last updated: 2026-10-06. https://disputeindex.com/events/4874-lt-col-tim-halbur-told-the-associated-press