Tammy Baldwin asks why the military was unable to protect or care for the soldiers
Tammy BaldwinU.S. senator from Wisconsin (D), member of the Senate Appropriations Committee
In an August 5 letter to Adm. Brad Cooper, commander of U.S. Central Command, Sen. Tammy Baldwin asked CENTCOM to release the Army Central investigation of the Port Shuaiba attack by August 18 and wrote that "Congress and the American people deserve clear answers on what happened on March 1 and why the U.S. military was unable to protect or care for our soldiers." She wrote that Hegseth's statement that no drone or defense request was denied "is clearly contradicted" by soldiers' accounts.
Responding to
Hegseth told the Senate Appropriations Committee that no drone or defense request was denied "at any level that I'm aware of."
“Congress and the American people deserve clear answers on what happened on March 1 and why the U.S. military was unable to protect or care for our soldiers.”
Original text

Where this statement fits
Did the military fail the troops wounded in the March 1 Iranian drone strike at Port Shuaiba?
On March 1, 2026, an Iranian drone struck a U.S. Army tactical operations center at Port Shuaiba, Kuwait, killing six soldiers of the Army Reserve's 103rd Sustainment Command and wounding dozens more. The next day Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described the drone as a "squirter" that made its way through air defenses and hit a fortified building. Survivors have since told CBS News and the Associated Press that the post had no defense against drones, that commanders had been warned, and that wounded soldiers waited days to be evacuated, were not recorded as combat wounded on arrival at Landstuhl and waited weeks or months for brain-injury care. The Pentagon says wounded troops are evaluated and may be admitted based on the severity of their injuries, the Army has rejected claims that it downplayed injuries, and the Army has not released its completed investigation. Democratic lawmakers have asked for answers. The dispute is over whether the military failed the troops at Port Shuaiba in how it protected them and how it cared for and documented the wounded.
Source and context
Original text
About this source
Letter dated August 5, 2026 asking CENTCOM to release the findings of the U.S. Army Central investigation of the Port Shuaiba attack by August 18 and to explain why medical care was not immediately available. Baldwin's office announced it in a press release the same day.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Baldwin wrote that she had asked Hegseth at a July 21 hearing to commit to releasing the investigation and that he said he would coordinate with Cooper. She wrote that the initial mistake of moving soldiers to Port Shuaiba was compounded by CENTCOM reportedly not increasing defenses after the site was identified as a likely target.
After the quotation
Baldwin asked CENTCOM to explain why U.S. military medical care was not immediately available on March 1 and why requests for more medical supplies were denied.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether the military failed the soldiers at Port Shuaiba in protecting them or in caring for the wounded. Baldwin states that the military was unable to protect or care for the soldiers, calls the move to the port a mistake compounded by inadequate defenses, and says Hegseth's denial is contradicted, which asserts the failure. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because the letter is a request for information; it loses because Baldwin states her own conclusion. Evidence: the original signed letter.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- U.S. Central Command, Pete Hegseth
More from this case
Read the full caseArmy declines to comment on soldiers' accounts until families are briefed on investigation findings
United States Army
“Out of respect for the primary next of kin who will be scheduled for briefs on the official findings of the completed investigation, we will not comment on specific details, individual accounts, or leaked portions of the report at this time”Read statement
Tina Marzan says those responsible should be held accountable if someone made a mistake
“If somebody messed up, those people need to be held responsible.”Read statement
Tim Halbur says senior commanders knew the intelligence reports before the move
“Obviously, somewhere at the two-star, three-star level, they knew the intelligence reports”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Tammy Baldwin asks why the military was unable to protect or care for the soldiers
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4869-in-an-august-5-letter-to-adm-brad
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Tammy Baldwin asks why the military was unable to protect or care for the soldiers". First published: 2026-10-06. Last updated: 2026-10-06. https://disputeindex.com/events/4869-in-an-august-5-letter-to-adm-brad