Pete Hegseth says every effort was made to provide medical care to the Port Shuaiba wounded
Pete HegsethSecretary of Defense, testifying before the Senate Appropriations Committee
At a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing, Sen. Tammy Baldwin asked Hegseth why soldiers wounded at Port Shuaiba did not receive proper medical care or prompt brain-injury screening. Hegseth said he was "not taking issue with the characterization of individual soldiers" but argued "that every effort was made to provide every level of medical care possible." Earlier in the exchange he said no drone or defense request was denied at any level he was aware of.
Responding to
Hegseth told the Senate Appropriations Committee that no drone or defense request was denied "at any level that I'm aware of."
“I'm not taking issue with the characterization of individual soldiers, but I would argue that every effort was made to provide every level of medical care possible”
Original video
Original text
Where this statement fits
Did the military fail the troops wounded in the March 1 Iranian drone strike at Port Shuaiba?
On March 1, 2026, an Iranian drone struck a U.S. Army tactical operations center at Port Shuaiba, Kuwait, killing six soldiers of the Army Reserve's 103rd Sustainment Command and wounding dozens more. The next day Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described the drone as a "squirter" that made its way through air defenses and hit a fortified building. Survivors have since told CBS News and the Associated Press that the post had no defense against drones, that commanders had been warned, and that wounded soldiers waited days to be evacuated, were not recorded as combat wounded on arrival at Landstuhl and waited weeks or months for brain-injury care. The Pentagon says wounded troops are evaluated and may be admitted based on the severity of their injuries, the Army has rejected claims that it downplayed injuries, and the Army has not released its completed investigation. Democratic lawmakers have asked for answers. The dispute is over whether the military failed the troops at Port Shuaiba in how it protected them and how it cared for and documented the wounded.
Source and context
Original video
About this source
Associated Press livestream of the Senate Appropriations Committee hearing on July 21, 2026 with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Gen. Dan Caine and Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins on the administration's supplemental funding request. Times are offsets into the stream. Quoted wording is our transcription, checked against the stream's captions and a second recording of the exchange.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Original text
About this source
Letter dated August 5, 2026 asking CENTCOM to release the findings of the U.S. Army Central investigation of the Port Shuaiba attack by August 18 and to explain why medical care was not immediately available. Baldwin's office announced it in a press release the same day.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Baldwin said she had met soldiers at Walter Reed who said most of those injured did not receive proper medical care in Kuwait, in Germany or in their first days back in the U.S. Earlier, asked why requests for medical and drone defense systems were denied, Hegseth said there was not "a single drone or defense request denied at any level that I'm aware of." Asked to commit to releasing the Army Central investigation, he said he would work with Adm. Brad Cooper "to make sure it's handled properly."
After the quotation
Hegseth added "understanding how CENTCOM operates" before the chair said the senator's time had expired.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether the military failed the soldiers at Port Shuaiba in protecting them or in caring for the wounded. Hegseth argues that every effort was made to provide medical care and, in the same exchange, that no drone or defense request was denied, which defends both the care and the protection. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because he says he is not disputing individual soldiers' accounts; it loses because he concedes no failure. Evidence: our transcription of video of the hearing, checked against the stream's captions.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Tammy Baldwin
More from this case
Read the full caseArmy declines to comment on soldiers' accounts until families are briefed on investigation findings
United States Army
“Out of respect for the primary next of kin who will be scheduled for briefs on the official findings of the completed investigation, we will not comment on specific details, individual accounts, or leaked portions of the report at this time”Read statement
Tina Marzan says those responsible should be held accountable if someone made a mistake
“If somebody messed up, those people need to be held responsible.”Read statement
Tim Halbur says senior commanders knew the intelligence reports before the move
“Obviously, somewhere at the two-star, three-star level, they knew the intelligence reports”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Pete Hegseth says every effort was made to provide medical care to the Port Shuaiba wounded
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4867-at-a-senate-appropriations-committee-hearing-sen-tammy
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Pete Hegseth says every effort was made to provide medical care to the Port Shuaiba wounded". First published: 2026-10-06. Last updated: 2026-10-06. https://disputeindex.com/events/4867-at-a-senate-appropriations-committee-hearing-sen-tammy