Army says claims that it downplays soldiers' injuries are not true
United States ArmyU.S. Army, written statement from a spokesperson to CBS News
Responding to survivors and families who told CBS News they were not treated as combat casualties, an Army spokesperson wrote that "The care and well-being of our Soldiers is of the highest priority" and that "Any assertion that the Army seeks to downplay a soldier's injuries is simply not true." The Army said designations such as "not seriously injured" had specific definitions that families were misconstruing.
“Any assertion that the Army seeks to downplay a soldier's injuries is simply not true.”
Reporting
Where this statement fits
Did the military fail the troops wounded in the March 1 Iranian drone strike at Port Shuaiba?
On March 1, 2026, an Iranian drone struck a U.S. Army tactical operations center at Port Shuaiba, Kuwait, killing six soldiers of the Army Reserve's 103rd Sustainment Command and wounding dozens more. The next day Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth described the drone as a "squirter" that made its way through air defenses and hit a fortified building. Survivors have since told CBS News and the Associated Press that the post had no defense against drones, that commanders had been warned, and that wounded soldiers waited days to be evacuated, were not recorded as combat wounded on arrival at Landstuhl and waited weeks or months for brain-injury care. The Pentagon says wounded troops are evaluated and may be admitted based on the severity of their injuries, the Army has rejected claims that it downplayed injuries, and the Army has not released its completed investigation. Democratic lawmakers have asked for answers. The dispute is over whether the military failed the troops at Port Shuaiba in how it protected them and how it cared for and documented the wounded.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
CBS News report on survivors and families who said the Army did not treat them as combat casualties. It quotes an Army spokesperson's written statements rejecting that the Army seeks to downplay injuries and explaining casualty designations.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
CBS News reported that several survivors and their families said they were not being treated as combat casualties. Sgt. 1st Class Cory Hicks told CBS he "absolutely" believes the Army and the Pentagon have tried to downplay the incident.
After the quotation
An Army spokesman said a soldier classified as seriously injured or very seriously injured is at risk of dying within 72 hours. On Hicks, the Army wrote that he "received the care and treatment necessary in theater" to prepare him for evacuation.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether the military failed the soldiers at Port Shuaiba in protecting them or in caring for, evacuating and documenting the wounded. The Army spokesperson flatly calls the assertion that the Army seeks to downplay soldiers' injuries "simply not true" and defends its casualty designations as having specific definitions, an explicit statement that the alleged conduct did not occur. The closest competing label is Challenged the characterization, because the Army also says families misconstrued the designations; unlike CENTCOM's May 19 statement, which concedes no plan is perfect and disputes only a description, this statement rejects the allegation outright. Evidence: a written Army statement quoted by CBS News.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseArmy declines to comment on soldiers' accounts until families are briefed on investigation findings
United States Army
“Out of respect for the primary next of kin who will be scheduled for briefs on the official findings of the completed investigation, we will not comment on specific details, individual accounts, or leaked portions of the report at this time”Read statement
Tina Marzan says those responsible should be held accountable if someone made a mistake
“If somebody messed up, those people need to be held responsible.”Read statement
Tim Halbur says senior commanders knew the intelligence reports before the move
“Obviously, somewhere at the two-star, three-star level, they knew the intelligence reports”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Army says claims that it downplays soldiers' injuries are not true
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4864-responding-to-survivors-and-families-who-told-cbs
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Army says claims that it downplays soldiers' injuries are not true". First published: 2026-10-06. Last updated: 2026-10-06. https://disputeindex.com/events/4864-responding-to-survivors-and-families-who-told-cbs