Parente says the shooting cannot be justified after presenting a reconstruction

Christopher ParenteAttorney representing Marimar Martinez

Condemned

Christopher Parente criticized Exum's shooting at the October 5 press conference. Discussing his legal team's reconstruction, he said the gunfire could not be justified and accused agents of giving false accounts to defend it.

“In what world could you justify that?”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)WTTW reports Parente's criticism and reconstruction at Martinez's October 5 press conferenceParagraph beginning 'In what world could you justify that?' and preceding paragraphs about the commissioned reconstruction; October 5, 2026, 6:39 PM.

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)AP reports CBP's response to Martinez's lawsuit and Parente's shooting allegations · Associated PressSection 'Agent fired into rear of car, attorneys say': Parente's three alleged false statements and CBP's statement in response to the suit; page updated October 5 at 8:46 PM EDT.

Case updates

Marimar Martinez is suing over the Exum shooting. What next?

Get an email if the court acts on Martinez's lawsuit, Chicago police complete their investigation of Exum, or CBP reports on its use-of-force review.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Other statements by Christopher Parente in this case

Every statement by Christopher Parente
The blood-stained interior of Marimar Martinez's car after she was shot by a Border Patrol agent in Chicago.
Credit: U.S. Attorney's Office for the Northern District of Illinois

Where this statement fits

Was Border Patrol Agent Charles Exum justified in shooting Marimar Martinez?

On October 4, 2025, U.S. Border Patrol Agent Charles Exum fired five rounds at Marimar Martinez’s vehicle during a confrontation involving the agents’ SUV and two civilian vehicles in Chicago’s Brighton Park neighborhood. A federal complaint alleged that Martinez and another driver struck and boxed in the agents’ vehicle and that Martinez then drove toward Exum. Martinez said Exum steered into her vehicle and shot her as she drove past or away. She sustained seven gunshot wounds. Federal prosecutors later dismissed the charges against Martinez with prejudice. An Illinois Accountability Commission review concluded that available video, photographs and witness evidence indicated Martinez was stationary or driving away and found reasonable cause to investigate a shooting without apparent justification. No publicly identified recording continuously captures the collision and gunfire, and no court has adjudicated whether Exum’s use of force was lawful. The dispute is whether Martinez posed an imminent threat when Exum fired.

Read the full case

Source and context

Reporting

WTTW reports Parente's criticism and reconstruction at Martinez's October 5 press conference (opens in a new tab)Paragraph beginning 'In what world could you justify that?' and preceding paragraphs about the commissioned reconstruction; October 5, 2026, 6:39 PM.

About this source

WTTW reports the October 5 press conference announcing Martinez's federal lawsuit. Parente criticizes Exum's shooting and alleges that agents gave false accounts of the encounter. The article describes a reconstruction commissioned by Martinez's attorneys and says her local police complaint was assigned to a detective.

Reporting

AP reports CBP's response to Martinez's lawsuit and Parente's shooting allegations (opens in a new tab) · Associated PressSection 'Agent fired into rear of car, attorneys say': Parente's three alleged false statements and CBP's statement in response to the suit; page updated October 5 at 8:46 PM EDT.

About this source

AP reports remarks made at Martinez's October 5 press conference and a CBP statement supplied in response to her lawsuit. CBP said Exum had been placed on administrative leave and described its use-of-force review process. The report does not date the original leave decision. Parente's allegations about the shooting and Exum's statements remain attributed to Martinez's lawyer.

Before the quotation

WTTW reports that Martinez's attorneys commissioned a reconstruction using bullet holes in her vehicle. Parente alleged that Exum's account of firing through the windshield was contradicted by shots entering from the vehicle's rear.

After the quotation

WTTW quotes Parente saying the shooting could not be justified and accusing agents of lying to defend it. AP independently reports his criticism of firing through the rear passenger window and his allegation that Exum made three false statements to the FBI.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Parente expressly rejects justification for Exum's gunfire. His rhetorical question and surrounding remarks criticize the shooting itself, beyond disputing the agents' description of the encounter.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Charles Exum

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Christopher Parente, Parente says the shooting cannot be justified after presenting a reconstructionDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Parente says the shooting cannot be justified after presenting a reconstruction
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4775-christopher-parente-criticized-exum-s-shooting-at-the

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Parente says the shooting cannot be justified after presenting a reconstruction". First published: 2026-10-06. Last updated: 2026-10-06. https://disputeindex.com/events/4775-christopher-parente-criticized-exum-s-shooting-at-the