Stew Peters mocks Wilkins's account of a coordinated campaign against her
Stew PetersBroadcaster and host of The Stew Peters Show
Late on March 24, 2026 (U.S. Eastern time), replying to Candace Owens's post about Wilkins's thread on a coordinated influence campaign, Stew Peters wrote that there was "no possible way" independent thinkers could "ALL come to the same conclusions that Alexis Wilkins is Mossad," that Charlie Kirk's assassination was a military operation being covered up, and that the United States should not fight Iran on Israel's behalf. He ended: "Statical impossibility!"
Responding to
Kyle Seraphin said on his podcast on August 22, 2025 that FBI Director Kash Patel "has had his own little 'honeypot' issue" and that Patel's girlfriend, Alexis Wilkins, is "a former Mossad agent in what is like the equivalent of their NSA," according to the transcript quoted in Wilkins's complaint and in the court's order denying his motion to dismiss.
“There is no possible way that a group of independent thinkers could ALL come to the same conclusions that Alexis Wilkins is Mossad”
Original post
Where this statement fits
Is Alexis Wilkins a foreign 'honeypot' agent, as Kyle Seraphin and other commentators suggested?
Since early 2025, online commentators have suggested that Alexis Wilkins, the country singer engaged to FBI Director Kash Patel, is an Israeli or Mossad "honeypot" sent to compromise him. Podcaster Kyle Seraphin said on August 22, 2025 that Patel's girlfriend is "a former Mossad agent" (he did not name her; a court found the remarks referred to her), Sam Parker raised the idea through questions in a February 2025 X thread, and Elijah Schaffer posted her photo under a thread about female Mossad operatives. Wilkins says she has never been an intelligence agent and has never been to Israel, and she sued all three for defamation. A Florida court let the Schaffer suit proceed, the parties then reported a tentative agreement and jointly dismissed it with prejudice, and on September 9, 2026 Schaffer posted a retraction saying she "is not, and has never been, a foreign intelligence operative"; a Utah court dismissed the Parker suit for lack of jurisdiction; the Seraphin suit is pending after the court denied his motion to dismiss. As of October 5, 2026, we found no evidence offered by anyone that Wilkins has worked for any intelligence service, and no court has ruled at trial on the claim.
Source and context
Original post
About this source
Peters replies sarcastically to Owens's criticism of Wilkins's account of an influence campaign.
Before the quotation
Earlier that evening Wilkins posted a 13-part thread saying she had been "falsely labeled a Mossad spy in a coordinated campaign." Candace Owens quote-posted it and called it "objectively hilarious."
After the quotation
Dan Bongino discussed Wilkins's thread on his show the next day.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is the proposition that Alexis Wilkins is, or was, a foreign intelligence agent, specifically an Israeli or Mossad "honeypot" in a relationship with Kash Patel to compromise him. Peters mocks Wilkins's claim that a coordinated campaign spread the Mossad label. He lists "Alexis Wilkins is Mossad" among conclusions he says independent thinkers reached, next to two political claims he presents as their shared views. The juxtaposition suggests he treats the label as an independently reached conclusion, but the sarcasm is aimed at the coordination claim and he does not say in his own words that she is an agent, so we used Mixed or conditional. The closest competing label is Condemned. It loses because the post describes how others reached a conclusion rather than asserting the proposition directly. Evidence level: his own post on X.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseJake Shields responds to Schaffer's retraction: "I'm glad Elijah cleared that up"
“I'm glad Elijah cleared that up Alexis Wikins is not an Israeli honeypot and the FBI is not funding her lawsuit”Read statement
Schaffer retracts his post and says Wilkins "is not, and has never been" a foreign intelligence operative
“I apologize for that implication because it is false to suggest she is a honeypot. Alexis Wilkins is not, and has never been, a foreign intelligence operative, foreign asset, or honeypot of any kind. There is no factual basis to suggest otherwise. … I retract my September 2025 post in full. The original post has been deleted.”Read statement
Seraphin's answer calls his remarks "opinion, satire, or rhetorical hyperbole"
“Deny. Defendant explicitly defined the term “honeypot” differently than the Complaint alleges. … The statements were expressions of opinion, satire, or rhetorical hyperbole, not verifiable false assertions of fact. … Defendant accurately and off-handedly reported third party allegations.”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Stew Peters mocks Wilkins's account of a coordinated campaign against her
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4741-late-on-march-24-2026-u-s-eastern
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Stew Peters mocks Wilkins's account of a coordinated campaign against her". First published: 2026-10-06. Last updated: 2026-10-06. https://disputeindex.com/events/4741-late-on-march-24-2026-u-s-eastern