Laura Loomer replies that people "can't just go around" calling others "Mossad" spies
Laura LoomerPolitical activist and commentator, on her X account
Replying on November 16, 2025 to Alex Jones, who had called Wilkins's suit against Elijah Schaffer "Kash Patel's insane anti-first amendment lawsuit," Laura Loomer wrote that the suit was Wilkins's, asked "how is it insane if she was defamed?" and said people "can't just go around calling everyone they don't like 'Mossad' spies."
Responding to
Wilkins's complaint against Seraphin says she "is not now and never has been an agent for any intelligence agency" and "has never set foot in Israel."
“That’s not Kash Patel. That’s his girlfriend. And how is it insane if she was defamed? People can’t just go around calling everyone they don’t like “Mossad” spies.”
Original post
Where this statement fits
Is Alexis Wilkins a foreign 'honeypot' agent, as Kyle Seraphin and other commentators suggested?
Since early 2025, online commentators have suggested that Alexis Wilkins, the country singer engaged to FBI Director Kash Patel, is an Israeli or Mossad "honeypot" sent to compromise him. Podcaster Kyle Seraphin said on August 22, 2025 that Patel's girlfriend is "a former Mossad agent" (he did not name her; a court found the remarks referred to her), Sam Parker raised the idea through questions in a February 2025 X thread, and Elijah Schaffer posted her photo under a thread about female Mossad operatives. Wilkins says she has never been an intelligence agent and has never been to Israel, and she sued all three for defamation. A Florida court let the Schaffer suit proceed, the parties then reported a tentative agreement and jointly dismissed it with prejudice, and on September 9, 2026 Schaffer posted a retraction saying she "is not, and has never been, a foreign intelligence operative"; a Utah court dismissed the Parker suit for lack of jurisdiction; the Seraphin suit is pending after the court denied his motion to dismiss. As of October 5, 2026, we found no evidence offered by anyone that Wilkins has worked for any intelligence service, and no court has ruled at trial on the claim.
Source and context
Original post
About this source
Loomer's reply to an Alex Jones post that called the suit against Elijah Schaffer "Kash Patel's insane anti-first amendment lawsuit."
Before the quotation
Alex Jones had posted a copy of Wilkins's complaint against Schaffer and called it "Kash Patel's insane anti-first amendment lawsuit."
After the quotation
The Florida court denied Schaffer's motion to dismiss on February 3, 2026. The case was dismissed by agreement in August 2026.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is the proposition that Alexis Wilkins is, or was, a foreign intelligence agent, specifically an Israeli or Mossad "honeypot" in a relationship with Kash Patel to compromise him. Loomer defends Wilkins's suit and treats the Mossad label as a smear, which rejects the accusation, but she does not say in terms that Wilkins is not an agent, so we used Challenged the characterization. The closest competing label is Denied, because calling it defamation implies the label is false. It loses because her point is about name-calling rather than an explicit statement about Wilkins. Evidence level: her own post on X.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseJake Shields responds to Schaffer's retraction: "I'm glad Elijah cleared that up"
“I'm glad Elijah cleared that up Alexis Wikins is not an Israeli honeypot and the FBI is not funding her lawsuit”Read statement
Schaffer retracts his post and says Wilkins "is not, and has never been" a foreign intelligence operative
“I apologize for that implication because it is false to suggest she is a honeypot. Alexis Wilkins is not, and has never been, a foreign intelligence operative, foreign asset, or honeypot of any kind. There is no factual basis to suggest otherwise. … I retract my September 2025 post in full. The original post has been deleted.”Read statement
Seraphin's answer calls his remarks "opinion, satire, or rhetorical hyperbole"
“Deny. Defendant explicitly defined the term “honeypot” differently than the Complaint alleges. … The statements were expressions of opinion, satire, or rhetorical hyperbole, not verifiable false assertions of fact. … Defendant accurately and off-handedly reported third party allegations.”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Laura Loomer replies that people "can't just go around" calling others "Mossad" spies
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4718-replying-on-november-16-2025-to-alex-jones
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Laura Loomer replies that people "can't just go around" calling others "Mossad" spies". First published: 2026-10-06. Last updated: 2026-10-06. https://disputeindex.com/events/4718-replying-on-november-16-2025-to-alex-jones