Falkenheim explains his Reese vote

Dan FalkenheimSports Illustrated reporter and awards voter

Falkenheim explains that reviewing defensive possessions led him to favor Reese, while recognizing the strengths of the other candidates.

Responding to

Angel Reese deserved the 2026 WNBA Defensive Player of the Year award.

“I voted for Angel Reese for Defensive Player of the Year.”

Original post

Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Falkenheim explains his Reese vote on XPost 2105738089163612550; author's own text
Angel Reese wearing an Atlanta Dream uniform in May 2026.
Credit: John McClellan; crop by Sportzeditz / Wikimedia Commons

Where this statement fits

Did Angel Reese deserve the 2026 WNBA Defensive Player of the Year award?

The WNBA named Angel Reese its 2026 Defensive Player of the Year on October 1. She received 46 of 74 votes, ahead of Gabby Williams with 20 and A'ja Wilson with four. Voters defend Reese's impact on Atlanta's defense. Sue Bird and Lindsay Gibbs favor Williams while calling Reese deserving. Dan Zaksheske criticizes the result, and Andrew Jerell Jones argues for a shared Reese and Wilson award.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original post

Falkenheim explains his Reese vote on X (opens in a new tab)Post 2105738089163612550; author's own text

About this source

Falkenheim posted after the league announced the award. He describes reviewing defensive possessions, acknowledges limits in evaluating defense and recognizes other deserving candidates.

Before the quotation

Falkenheim posted after the league announced the award.

After the quotation

He describes reviewing defensive possessions, acknowledges limits in evaluating defense and recognizes other deserving candidates.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to selecting Reese, Falkenheim supports the choice. Acknowledging other deserving candidates and the limits of his evaluation does not create a conflicting position.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Angel Reese, WNBA

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Falkenheim explains his Reese vote
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4436-falkenheim-explains-that-reviewing-defensive-possessions-led-him

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Falkenheim explains his Reese vote". First published: 2026-10-02. Last updated: 2026-10-02. https://disputeindex.com/events/4436-falkenheim-explains-that-reviewing-defensive-possessions-led-him