Courtney, Amo and Magaziner jointly condemned the Revolution Wind halt and opposed an additional defense review, arguing that the project had already been vetted

Joe CourtneyU.S. representative from Connecticut, in a joint statement with Gabe Amo and Seth Magaziner

Condemned

Courtney, Amo and Magaziner jointly condemned the Revolution Wind halt and opposed an additional defense review, arguing that the project had already been vetted.

“The Administration must lift its halt work order immediately.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)House votes down offshore-wind certification amendment after Courtney, Amo and Magaziner urge oppositionSeptember 11 release, first paragraph; Joint lawmakers' quoted statement

Case updates

Is the court fight over the Revolution Wind halts finished?

Get an email if the court issues a final ruling on the stop-work orders, if federal officials take new action against the project, or if it reaches full operation.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Other statements by Joe Courtney in this case

Every statement by Joe Courtney
Wind turbine blades and tower components at the New London offshore-wind port.
Credit: Pi.1415926535

Where this statement fits

Was the federal government justified in halting Revolution Wind construction?

Federal officials halted construction of Revolution Wind off Rhode Island in August and December 2025, citing national-security concerns. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum defended the December pause, while Senators Jack Reed and Sheldon Whitehouse criticized the interruptions. A federal judge granted preliminary injunctions against both orders. In September 2026, Connecticut announced installation of the project's final turbine.

Read the full case

Source and context

Official statement

House votes down offshore-wind certification amendment after Courtney, Amo and Magaziner urge opposition (opens in a new tab)September 11 release, first paragraph; Joint lawmakers' quoted statement

About this source

The House voted 209-224 against an NDAA amendment requiring further Defense Department certifications for offshore-wind projects, including Revolution Wind. Courtney, Amo and Magaziner jointly condemned the Revolution Wind halt and opposed an additional defense review, arguing that the project had already been vetted.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The House rejected an additional offshore-wind certification requirement.

After the quotation

Courtney, Amo and Magaziner said the administration should lift the construction halt immediately.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Criticizes the federal halt, not merely the project's merits.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Joe Courtney, Courtney, Amo and Magaziner jointly condemned the Revolution Wind halt and opposed an additional defense review, arguing that the project had already been vettedDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Courtney, Amo and Magaziner jointly condemned the Revolution Wind halt and opposed an additional defense review, arguing that the project had already been vetted
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4290-courtney-amo-and-magaziner-jointly-condemned-the-revolution

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Courtney, Amo and Magaziner jointly condemned the Revolution Wind halt and opposed an additional defense review, arguing that the project had already been vetted". First published: 2026-10-01. Last updated: 2026-10-01. https://disputeindex.com/events/4290-courtney-amo-and-magaziner-jointly-condemned-the-revolution