The state defendants defended incarceration-cost recovery in court, arguing that it compensates the government rather than imposes an excessive fine

Office of the Connecticut Attorney GeneralCounsel representing the Connecticut state defendants

Defended or excused

The state defendants defended incarceration-cost recovery in court, arguing that it compensates the government rather than imposes an excessive fine. They also sought dismissal on standing and jurisdictional grounds.

“remedial and therefore not fines”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Connecticut state defendants' memorandum supporting dismissal, June 17, 2022Pages 1-2, introduction to June 17 motion

Case updates

Connecticut's prison-fee debt law: want updates?

We'll send an email if lawmakers take up repeal or changes to the law, if Lamont's office offers administrative relief, or if state officials answer critics.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Tracy DeSenti looks at a framed photograph of her late husband, Billy DeSenti.
Credit: Sarah Gordon/CT Mirror

Where this statement fits

Should Connecticut collect per diem incarceration fees from former inmates' settlements and windfalls?

Connecticut has charged incarcerated people a daily fee for the cost of their imprisonment since 1995, and state law lets the Department of Administrative Services collect on that debt for up to 20 years after release, including by taking up to half of a lottery win, inheritance or lawsuit settlement, or a lien against a deceased person's estate. A Connecticut Mirror investigation published September 27, 2026 found the daily rate has reached $347, that a year in prison can produce a debt of nearly $127,000, and that the state collected about $21 million this way from 2020 to mid-2026 from hundreds of formerly incarcerated people, including money from wrongful-death and police-brutality settlements. The legislature narrowed the law in 2022 and 2024, and a federal lawsuit led the state to withdraw its claims against its four named plaintiffs by October 2024, but collection from others has continued. The dispute is whether Connecticut should be allowed to collect this debt from former inmates' settlements, inheritances and windfalls at all, not whether any individual's specific bill was calculated correctly.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Connecticut state defendants' memorandum supporting dismissal, June 17, 2022 (opens in a new tab)Pages 1-2, introduction to June 17 motion

About this source

The state defendants defended incarceration-cost recovery in court, arguing that it compensates the government rather than imposes an excessive fine. They also sought dismissal on standing and jurisdictional grounds.

Before the quotation

State defendants asked a federal court to dismiss a challenge to Connecticut's incarceration-cost collection law.

After the quotation

The defendants also raised standing and jurisdictional objections to the lawsuit.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Defends the state's recovery of incarceration costs in the litigation.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Office of the Connecticut Attorney General, The state defendants defended incarceration-cost recovery in court, arguing that it compensates the government rather than imposes an excessive fineDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
The state defendants defended incarceration-cost recovery in court, arguing that it compensates the government rather than imposes an excessive fine
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4278-the-state-defendants-defended-incarceration-cost-recovery-in

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "The state defendants defended incarceration-cost recovery in court, arguing that it compensates the government rather than imposes an excessive fine". First published: 2026-10-01. Last updated: 2026-10-01. https://disputeindex.com/events/4278-the-state-defendants-defended-incarceration-cost-recovery-in