Mumina Egal and Anna VanCleave jointly urged repeal, arguing that prison debt obstructs reentry and that taking inheritances and settlements harms families without a sound fiscal rationale

Mumina EgalUConn law student, writing jointly with Anna VanCleave

Condemned

Mumina Egal and Anna VanCleave jointly urged repeal, arguing that prison debt obstructs reentry and that taking inheritances and settlements harms families without a sound fiscal rationale.

“harmful and makes bad economic policy”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)UConn testimony supporting HB 5390Pages 1-2, joint testimony; Pages 3-6, separate joint testimony

Case updates

Connecticut's prison-fee debt law: want updates?

We'll send an email if lawmakers take up repeal or changes to the law, if Lamont's office offers administrative relief, or if state officials answer critics.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Tracy DeSenti looks at a framed photograph of her late husband, Billy DeSenti.
Credit: Sarah Gordon/CT Mirror

Where this statement fits

Should Connecticut collect per diem incarceration fees from former inmates' settlements and windfalls?

Connecticut has charged incarcerated people a daily fee for the cost of their imprisonment since 1995, and state law lets the Department of Administrative Services collect on that debt for up to 20 years after release, including by taking up to half of a lottery win, inheritance or lawsuit settlement, or a lien against a deceased person's estate. A Connecticut Mirror investigation published September 27, 2026 found the daily rate has reached $347, that a year in prison can produce a debt of nearly $127,000, and that the state collected about $21 million this way from 2020 to mid-2026 from hundreds of formerly incarcerated people, including money from wrongful-death and police-brutality settlements. The legislature narrowed the law in 2022 and 2024, and a federal lawsuit led the state to withdraw its claims against its four named plaintiffs by October 2024, but collection from others has continued. The dispute is whether Connecticut should be allowed to collect this debt from former inmates' settlements, inheritances and windfalls at all, not whether any individual's specific bill was calculated correctly.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

UConn testimony supporting HB 5390 (opens in a new tab)Pages 1-2, joint testimony; Pages 3-6, separate joint testimony

About this source

Kiel Brennan-Marquez and Riley Breakell jointly urged repeal of Connecticut's incarceration lien, arguing that it undermines civil-rights remedies and imposes excessive, poorly disclosed punishment. Mumina Egal and Anna VanCleave jointly urged repeal, arguing that prison debt obstructs reentry and that taking inheritances and settlements harms families without a sound fiscal rationale.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Connecticut's Judiciary Committee heard testimony on HB 5390, which proposed ending incarceration-cost liability.

After the quotation

Egal and VanCleave argued that prison debt obstructed reentry and harmed families.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Urges repeal of continued fee collection; welcoming partial reform does not endorse the remaining liens.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Mumina Egal, Mumina Egal and Anna VanCleave jointly urged repeal, arguing that prison debt obstructs reentry and that taking inheritances and settlements harms families without a sound fiscal rationaleDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Mumina Egal and Anna VanCleave jointly urged repeal, arguing that prison debt obstructs reentry and that taking inheritances and settlements harms families without a sound fiscal rationale
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4269-mumina-egal-and-anna-vancleave-jointly-urged-repeal

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Mumina Egal and Anna VanCleave jointly urged repeal, arguing that prison debt obstructs reentry and that taking inheritances and settlements harms families without a sound fiscal rationale". First published: 2026-10-01. Last updated: 2026-10-01. https://disputeindex.com/events/4269-mumina-egal-and-anna-vancleave-jointly-urged-repeal