Samantha Dynowski condemned the halt as unlawful and careless, citing lost work and delays to lower-pollution electricity

Samantha DynowskiConnecticut chapter director, Sierra Club

Condemned

Samantha Dynowski condemned the halt as unlawful and careless, citing lost work and delays to lower-pollution electricity.

“The Trump administration’s actions were unlawful and careless.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Judge Overrules Revolution Wind Stop Work OrderSeptember 22 release, Dynowski statement

Case updates

Is the court fight over the Revolution Wind halts finished?

Get an email if the court issues a final ruling on the stop-work orders, if federal officials take new action against the project, or if it reaches full operation.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Wind turbine blades and tower components at the New London offshore-wind port.
Credit: Pi.1415926535

Where this statement fits

Was the federal government justified in halting Revolution Wind construction?

Federal officials halted construction of Revolution Wind off Rhode Island in August and December 2025, citing national-security concerns. Interior Secretary Doug Burgum defended the December pause, while Senators Jack Reed and Sheldon Whitehouse criticized the interruptions. A federal judge granted preliminary injunctions against both orders. In September 2026, Connecticut announced installation of the project's final turbine.

Read the full case

Source and context

Official statement

Judge Overrules Revolution Wind Stop Work Order (opens in a new tab)September 22 release, Dynowski statement

About this source

Samantha Dynowski condemned the halt as unlawful and careless, citing lost work and delays to lower-pollution electricity.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

A federal judge allowed Revolution Wind construction to resume after the August halt.

After the quotation

Dynowski said completing the project would provide lower-pollution electricity and allow workers to return.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Criticizes the federal halt, not merely the project's merits.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Samantha Dynowski, Samantha Dynowski condemned the halt as unlawful and careless, citing lost work and delays to lower-pollution electricityDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Samantha Dynowski condemned the halt as unlawful and careless, citing lost work and delays to lower-pollution electricity
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4254-samantha-dynowski-condemned-the-halt-as-unlawful-and

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Samantha Dynowski condemned the halt as unlawful and careless, citing lost work and delays to lower-pollution electricity". First published: 2026-10-01. Last updated: 2026-10-01. https://disputeindex.com/events/4254-samantha-dynowski-condemned-the-halt-as-unlawful-and