Wayne Rooney says of the reported verdict "take them off them" and that he would not accept a retrospective medal
Wayne RooneyFormer Manchester United and England captain and former club manager, speaking on the Stick to United podcast
On the Stick to United podcast, published September 29, 2026, Wayne Rooney said, "going back to they've cheated, take them off them," that he had "no problem with that," and that he would be "comfortable with them getting it took off them" but would not be comfortable accepting a medal for finishing second.
Responding to
The Premier League said on September 29, 2026 that an independent commission found that between the 2009/10 and 2017/18 seasons Manchester City arranged "sham" contracts with a number of its commercial partners as part of a disguised funding scheme, in which the sponsors were required to pay only a portion of the relevant fees and Abu Dhabi United Group Investment & Development Ltd, which owned the club, funded the remainder, and that "by its conduct the club clearly intended to circumvent the PL Rules."
“And again going back to they've cheated, take them off them. That's fine, I've no problem with that. But to turn around and say, right, there's a medal, I just wouldn't feel comfortable taking it. I'd be comfortable with them getting it took off them, but I wouldn't be comfortable accepting a medal for finishing second.”
Original video
Reporting
Where this statement fits
Did Manchester City use 'sham' sponsorships to circumvent Premier League financial rules, as an independent commission found and the club denies?
On September 29, 2026, the Premier League published the redacted core decision of an independent commission that heard its charges against Manchester City. The commission found that between the 2009/10 and 2017/18 seasons City arranged sponsorship contracts that it described as "shams" with a number of Abu Dhabi sponsors, as part of what it called a disguised funding scheme in which the club's owner, Abu Dhabi United Group Investment & Development Ltd (ADUG), paid most of the recorded fees. It found that the club "clearly intended to circumvent the PL Rules." It found all of the financial-rule charges proven and most of the co-operation charges proven. City says it is innocent, that "a comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence exists" in support of its positions, and that the opinion is unsafe. It says it will appeal, and the deadline is October 2. The sanction has not been decided. As of October 1, 2026, this is a first-instance decision that an Appeal Board has not reviewed on the merits. The disputed question is whether City used sponsorship contracts that the commission described as shams, and related arrangements, to misstate its finances and circumvent the Premier League's financial rules.
Source and context
Original video
About this source
Wayne Rooney's appearance on Stick to United, published at 07:00 UTC on September 29, 2026. That was before the Premier League published the decision, and Rooney was reacting to the reports of September 25. The passage quoted follows the spoken words in the video.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Reporting
About this source
BBC Sport's running report on reaction to the verdict. It includes Rooney's remarks about not wanting a Premier League medal awarded retrospectively, in a lightly edited form.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The episode was published at 07:00 UTC on September 29, 2026, before the Premier League published the commission's decision, and Rooney was reacting to the reports of September 25. Earlier in the episode he said he would not feel comfortable accepting a retrospective Premier League medal because United had not done enough that season to win the league.
After the quotation
BBC Sport reported his remarks on the medal and, separately, that he favors relegation and spending restrictions as the sanction. As of October 1, 2026, no sanction had been set, and we found no report that City had formally lodged an appeal.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to the proposition that City used sponsorship contracts the commission described as shams, and related arrangements, to misstate its finances and circumvent the Premier League's financial rules, as the commission found, Rooney accepts the reported outcome as the premise ("they've cheated") and says he has no problem with the titles being taken off City. That endorses the finding, so we used Condemned. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because his main point is about whether he would accept a retrospective medal, but he states no condition on the finding.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseGary Neville says "the biggest consequence would be the removal of the owners" after the commission's decision
“The biggest consequence would be the removal of the owners. That is the only consequence, if I was Manchester City, that I would be worried about. And as a fan of Manchester City, if you wanted to keep the investment that you've currently got, that would be the one that I would be most concerned. However, if you're in football and you're thinking about a consequence, what can be more serious than industrial-level financial doping that we've seen and they've been found guilty of?”Read statement
Etihad Airways says it "categorically rejects any finding, conclusion or implication" that it was involved in improper arrangements
Etihad Airways
“Etihad Airways has reviewed the Premier League commission's published opinion relating to the disciplinary proceedings involving Manchester City, together with the Premier League's public communication of its findings. Etihad categorically rejects any finding, conclusion or implication that suggests the airline has ever been involved in improper commercial arrangements. The Premier League's public communication of the commission's findings, following a period of selective leaks and reporting, has further created damaging implications for Etihad despite the airline not being named in the redacted published findings. At no time did the Premier League reach out to or engage with Etihad in the process associated with the commission's opinion. Etihad was therefore never given the opportunity by the Premier League to be represented, to provide relevant information, or to ensure the accuracy and fairness of information relied upon in reaching conclusions that may now be interpreted as reflecting adversely on the airline. Etihad is deeply concerned by the way this matter has been communicated publicly. The lack of clarity and transparency, together with the selective disclosure of information, has created damaging implications for Etihad despite the airline not being named in the published decision. The Premier League must take responsibility for the consequences of the way in which these findings have been presented. Etihad is immensely proud of its longstanding relationship with Manchester City. The Etihad name has been proudly carried by the club and its stadium for many years, as part of a partnership that has connected us with millions of supporters around the world. Our commitment to Manchester City, its supporters and our shared partnership remains strong. We stand with the club, its supporters and our wider Etihad community as Manchester City challenges the commission's conclusions through the processes available to it. Etihad will seek the relevant legal counsel on the options and recourse available to protect its interests.”Read statement
IFR chair David Kogan says the decision "raises serious issues" and the regulator will "await further developments"
“The independent commission’s decision raises serious issues. The IFR has powers to assess the suitability of owners, directors and executives and we will use these powers where appropriate, in the interests of protecting the sustainability, honesty and integrity of English football where there is clear evidence of wrongdoing by individuals. This includes taking account of findings made by the Leagues. However, as the proceedings remain ongoing between Manchester City and the Premier League we will await further developments. We hope it can be resolved quickly for the sake of fans. For now, we have no further comment.”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Wayne Rooney says of the reported verdict "take them off them" and that he would not accept a retrospective medal
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4014-on-the-stick-to-united-podcast-published-september
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Wayne Rooney says of the reported verdict "take them off them" and that he would not accept a retrospective medal". First published: 2026-10-01. Last updated: 2026-10-01. https://disputeindex.com/events/4014-on-the-stick-to-united-podcast-published-september