Tristan Buckmaster
- Role
- Mathematician involved in the research-credit dispute, posting on Mastodon
- Statement date
"This below is absolute academic malpractice:"
Source and context
Original text
About this source
Escalates criticism of OpenAI's description of the research path and raises an unpublished-result/training concern. Neither targeted access nor training on the specific work is established. Keep OpenAI's already recorded denial/caveat linked; image content not independently inspected. Timestamp from original post metadata. Original Mastodon text, timestamp, author continuity with existing primary source and full context verified.
Before the quotation
Buckmaster had already disputed authorship and credit surrounding OpenAI's mathematical research. This September 8 post is an older missed follow-up, not a new September 10 development.
After the quotation
The post raises an unpublished-result and training-data concern, but neither targeted access nor training on this particular work has been established. OpenAI's denial and qualification remain recorded in the case. The accompanying image was not independently inspected; this record is limited to the verified written post.
How this statement is classified
Buckmaster directly alleges improper academic conduct in the research narrative. His training-data concern remains an allegation, not an established finding.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- OpenAI
More from this case
"De-identification may remove a name; it does not remove the intellectual content of a mathematical idea."Read statement
"exactly how was this done?"Read statement
"Did any human or agent look at user data as part of the Navier Stokes effort? No."Read statement