Iranian Americans for Liberty says residency shouldn't shield Hashemi's family

Iranian Americans for LibertyOrganization identified by the @LibertyIranian X account

The @LibertyIranian account argued that residence status should not bar the family’s removal merely because relatives had not been charged with a U.S. crime.

“Permanent residency in the United States is not an entitlement that must be extended to relatives of senior regime figures simply because the relatives themselves have not been charged with a U.S. crime.”

Original post

Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Iranian Americans for Liberty’s August 22, 2026 X post about removalX post ID 2091225485678112805
Hashemi–Tahmasebi family

Where this statement fits

Did ICE Detain an Entire Family for What Eissa Hashemi’s Mother Did?

On April 11, 2026, the U.S. State Department said it had terminated the lawful permanent resident status of Seyed Eissa Hashemi, Maryam Tahmasebi, and their son, and that ICE had them in custody pending removal. Officials cited family ties and foreign-policy or national-security grounds; the family, its lawyers, and other commentators have disputed the action as family-based punishment. This case records those competing positions without deciding the legal validity of the action or the family’s current status.

Read the full case

Case updates

Waiting on a ruling for the Hashemi-Tahmasebi family?

Get an email if Judge Rodriguez rules on the family's habeas petition, if their custody or removal status changes, or if officials say more about the grounds.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original post

Iranian Americans for Liberty’s August 22, 2026 X post about removal (opens in a new tab)X post ID 2091225485678112805

About this source

Original post from the @LibertyIranian account arguing that the family’s removal should proceed. Organizational identity and representation remain in review.

Before the quotation

The account commented publicly on the case after reporting about detention and advocacy on the family’s behalf.

After the quotation

The original post also rejects public advocacy and crowdfunding as a legal or policy veto over removal; organizational identity and account representation require review.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The post expressly supports carrying out removal, while not addressing detention conditions or duration.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Iranian Americans for Liberty, Iranian Americans for Liberty says residency shouldn't shield Hashemi's familyDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Iranian Americans for Liberty says residency shouldn't shield Hashemi's family
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/362-the-libertyiranian-account-argued-that-residence-status-should

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Iranian Americans for Liberty says residency shouldn't shield Hashemi's family". First published: 2026-09-10. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/362-the-libertyiranian-account-argued-that-residence-status-should