Palestine Legal's Radhika Sainath doubts Kraft could veto Macklemore and faults Sheeran's response
Radhika SainathLitigation director, Palestine Legal
Radhika Sainath, litigation director at Palestine Legal, told Al Jazeera she found it highly unlikely that the stadium owner had a late power to veto tour openers who expressed support for Palestinian human rights. She said Sheeran would have kept the moral high ground, and likely had a strong case for damages, had he fought back instead of giving in.
“I haven’t seen the terms of his contract, but I find it highly unlikely that the stadium owner retained an eleventh-hour power to veto tour openers expressing support for Palestinian human rights. If Sheeran had fought back instead of giving in to censorship and bullying, not only would he have retained the moral high ground with his millions of fans – and been on the right side of history – he would likely have a strong case for hundreds of thousands of dollars in damages for whatever losses he incurred over Kraft’s threatened cancellation”
Reporting

Where this statement fits
Macklemore’s “Free Palestine” speech and removal from Ed Sheeran’s U.S. tour
At two Ed Sheeran concerts at MetLife Stadium, Macklemore called for a free Palestine, accused Israel of apartheid and genocide, and said criticism of Israel was not criticism of Jewish people. After venue objections, tour promoter Messina Touring Group said he would not perform the remaining U.S. Loop Tour dates. Critics characterized the performance as hostile or inappropriate; Macklemore defended it as a call for equal treatment.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Al Jazeera explainer of September 15, 2026 on Robert Kraft's role in Macklemore's removal from Ed Sheeran's U.S. tour. It quotes Kraft's and Sheeran's statements and comments from Palestine Legal's litigation director.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Al Jazeera reported that Robert Kraft, who owns Gillette Stadium, said in a statement that letting Macklemore perform there would cross a line, and that Sheeran said on Tuesday, September 15, that the removal was decided by the venues and the promoter. It also reported that Macklemore said in an Instagram post that Sheeran told him Kraft had rallied other stadium owners, and that Kraft's public statement did not address that claim.
After the quotation
Al Jazeera's article then turned to Kraft's earlier response to campus protests, including his 2024 suspension of donations to Columbia University, and to reactions from other artists and venues.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The case looks at Macklemore's Free Palestine speech and his removal from the tour. Sainath doubts that a stadium owner could veto an opener for expressing support for Palestinian human rights and describes Sheeran's response as giving in to censorship and bullying. That sides with Macklemore against the removal, so we labeled it Defended or excused, the same label we gave other statements that back Macklemore.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Robert Kraft, Ed Sheeran
More from this case
Read the full caseMacklemore says the "billionaire class" should not decide "which voices are allowed on stage"
“What happened to me is bigger than one artist or one stage. When the billionaire class can decide which voices are allowed on stage and which ones are too dangerous to hear, everyone should be paying attention. So we're going on tour. All proceeds will benefit organizations supporting the Palestinian people and movement.”Read statement
Jewish Voice for Peace says the backlash to Macklemore's removal shows support for pro-Palestine speech
Jewish Voice for Peace
“Two years into Trump’s crackdown on pro-Palestine organizing, the backlash against Sheeran shows how little patience Americans have for attacks on pro-Palestine speech. It also demonstrates the shift toward support for Palestinian rights among everyday Americans that our movements have helped propel.”Read statement
Macklemore announces "Free Palestine Tour" after removal from U.S. dates
“To push back when the call for a Free Palestine is met with attempts to silence it.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Palestine Legal's Radhika Sainath doubts Kraft could veto Macklemore and faults Sheeran's response
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/3407-radhika-sainath-litigation-director-at-palestine-legal-told
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Palestine Legal's Radhika Sainath doubts Kraft could veto Macklemore and faults Sheeran's response". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3407-radhika-sainath-litigation-director-at-palestine-legal-told