ACLU of Southern California says no sheriff has a legitimate role in handling ballots and demands an end to the investigation

ACLU of Southern CaliforniaRegional civil liberties organization; statement issued by its executive director, Chandra Bhatnagar

Condemned

The ACLU of Southern California said no sheriff has a legitimate role in administering elections or handling voters' ballots, and that Sheriff Chad Bianco's investigation is a serious threat to voter privacy. It said it joined Attorney General Rob Bonta and state officials in demanding that Bianco end the investigation.

“Let’s be clear: no sheriff has a legitimate role — much less experience — in administering our elections or in handling hundreds of thousands of voters’ ballots. The sheriff's investigation represents a serious threat to voter privacy, undermines our democratic process and raises questions about the misuse of law enforcement authority for political gain. Against the backdrop of the U.S. Department of Justice pressuring states to turn over unredacted voter rolls, this fishing expedition sets a dangerous precedent and reeks of election meddling. We cannot look away as a local official engages in an authoritarian power grab straight out of President Trump's playbook. We join Attorney General Bonta and our state officials in demanding Bianco put an immediate end to this frivolous investigation.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)ACLU: Sheriff Bianco is Meddling with Elections · ACLU of Southern CaliforniaPress release, statement of Executive Director Chandra Bhatnagar

Case updates

Updates on the Riverside ballot seizure after the court's ruling

Get notified if new court filings follow the California Supreme Court's ruling, Bianco takes further steps in his inquiry, or state officials respond.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Editorial composite of Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco beside the California Supreme Court opinion in the ballot-seizure case.
Credit: Riverside County Sheriff's Office; Supreme Court of California; composite by The Dispute Index

Where this statement fits

Was Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco's seizure of about 650,000 ballots lawful?

Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco's department obtained search warrants in February and March 2026 and, on February 26, seized about 650,000 ballots from the November 2025 Proposition 50 special election from the county registrar of voters. Bianco said he was investigating a discrepancy of 45,896 ballots reported by a citizens' group; Registrar Art Tinoco said the reported gap reflected a misreading of preliminary records and that the actual variance was 103 ballots. Attorney General Rob Bonta directed Bianco on February 26 to preserve the materials and pause the investigation, and sued after Bianco said on March 20 that it would continue despite the Attorney General's attempts to stop it. On September 24, 2026, the California Supreme Court unanimously held in Cervantes v. Bianco that the seizure violated Elections Code section 15551(d) and ordered the ballots returned, and held in Bonta v. Bianco that the Attorney General may give a sheriff binding directions about an investigation. Bianco says the investigation was lawful and that he disagrees with the rulings, but has said he will obey the court's writs; the court did not resolve whether the claimed discrepancy exists.

Read the full case

Source and context

Official statement

ACLU: Sheriff Bianco is Meddling with Elections (opens in a new tab) · ACLU of Southern CaliforniaPress release, statement of Executive Director Chandra Bhatnagar

About this source

Press release from the ACLU of Southern California responding to reports that the Riverside County sheriff had seized voters' ballots.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The release said the statement was issued in response to reports that Bianco had seized more than half a million voters' ballots.

After the quotation

The release also said Bianco had repeatedly drawn criticism for what it called false or misleading claims, citing his department's transparency and the number of in-custody deaths in Riverside County.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is Sheriff Bianco's seizure and handling of the ballots. The ACLU of Southern California said no sheriff has a legitimate role in handling voters' ballots, called the investigation a serious threat to voter privacy, and joined the Attorney General in demanding that Bianco end it. That rejects the seizure as illegitimate, so we labeled it Condemned.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Chad Bianco

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: ACLU of Southern California, ACLU of Southern California says no sheriff has a legitimate role in handling ballots and demands an end to the investigationDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
ACLU of Southern California says no sheriff has a legitimate role in handling ballots and demands an end to the investigation
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/3398-the-aclu-of-southern-california-said-no-sheriff

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "ACLU of Southern California says no sheriff has a legitimate role in handling ballots and demands an end to the investigation". First published: 2026-09-30. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/3398-the-aclu-of-southern-california-said-no-sheriff