David Shoebridge backs foreign-military questions on arrival cards

Australian Greens senator for New South Wales

“The Greens are proposing that information contained on the passenger card should include some basic questions.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Senate debate on the Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026, September 7David Shoebridge, 6:46 pm; Anthony Chisholm, 7:47 pm

Source and context

Original text

Senate debate on the Regulatory Reform Omnibus Bill 2026, September 7 (opens in a new tab)David Shoebridge, 6:46 pm; Anthony Chisholm, 7:47 pm

About this source

Senate second-reading transcript containing Shoebridge's argument for foreign-military membership questions and Chisholm's response for the government.

Before the quotation

Shoebridge introduced the Greens amendment during the second-reading debate and described the absence of a routine foreign-military membership question.

After the quotation

He cited conflicts involving Israel, Russia, Sudan and other countries, then argued that an incoming passenger card was a suitable place to collect the information.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

Case context: Should Australia require incoming travelers to disclose recent foreign military membership?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to the proposed arrival-card requirement, Shoebridge supports adding the questions and argues that the information would help authorities assess potential risks.

Recorded on
Published here
Sample Australian incoming passenger card showing required declaration questions.
Credit: Australian Government Department of Home Affairs

More from this case

Read the full case

Anthony Chisholm

“the government will not be supporting the amendments moved by the Greens to include foreign military membership”
Read statement