Dylan Jackaway questions Cornell's disciplinary process
Dylan JackawayCornell alumnus writing a guest opinion column
Jackaway says Cornell's handling of the Chi Phi allegations undermines confidence in its disciplinary process.
Responding to
Cornell's disciplinary response to the Chi Phi allegations was inadequate.
“The University cannot expect the student body to treat the campus disciplinary process as legitimate”
Original text
Official statement
Where this statement fits
Did Cornell adequately discipline the students named in the Cornell 7 lawsuit?
A former Cornell student alleges that seven Chi Phi members sexually assaulted her in October 2024 and that Cornell mishandled the aftermath. The Cornell Daily Sun's editorial board and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez criticized the university's response. Cornell says its Title IX process resulted in expulsions and suspensions, and that essays were not the sole consequence for any student found responsible. AP subsequently reported individual sanctions and housing concerns.
Source and context
Original text
About this source
Guest columnist Dylan Jackaway argues that Cornell's handling of the allegations weakens confidence in its disciplinary process.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Official statement
About this source
Cornell says its Title IX process resulted in expulsions and suspensions, and says no student was offered an essay as the sole consequence of conduct found to have occurred.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Jackaway wrote a guest column contrasting the reported Chi Phi sanctions with Cornell's treatment of pro-Palestinian protesters.
After the quotation
Cornell later rejected the description of essays as the sole consequence and said it had imposed expulsions and suspensions.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Jackaway argues that Cornell's handling of the Chi Phi allegations undermines the legitimacy of its disciplinary process.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Cornell University
More from this case
Read the full caseThomson urges evidence before sweeping censure
“We simply don't know yet, and I hope the Yates investigation will provide more clarity on this question.”Read statement
Kelles questions how Cornell police obtained Jane Doe's statement
“I felt like it would have been good to follow up and not just take that statement as she signed it”Read statement
Cornell AAUP criticizes transparency about judicial determinations
Cornell Chapter of the AAUP
“the community was denied adequate transparency about the determinations of the judicial processes”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Dylan Jackaway questions Cornell's disciplinary process
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/3248-jackaway-says-cornell-s-handling-of-the-chi
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Dylan Jackaway questions Cornell's disciplinary process". First published: 2026-09-29. Last updated: 2026-09-29. https://disputeindex.com/events/3248-jackaway-says-cornell-s-handling-of-the-chi