Adriana Vink calls Cornell's disciplinary response appalling
Cornell student-government representative and opinion columnist
“the university response has been appalling, genuinely”
Source and context
Original video
About this source
At about 02:22:35, Piker criticizes Cornell's disciplinary response. At about 03:32:30, he speaks with Adriana Vink about the case.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Archived source
About this source
The transcript provides timestamps and wording for Piker's remarks and his conversation with Vink. Automatic transcription may contain errors.
Official statement
About this source
Cornell says its Title IX process resulted in expulsions and suspensions, and says no student was offered an essay as the sole consequence of conduct found to have occurred.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
During a livestream conversation, Vink described her own suspension and arrest during a campus protest before criticizing Cornell's handling of the Chi Phi allegations.
After the quotation
Cornell later said it had imposed expulsions and suspensions in the Chi Phi matter.
How this statement is classified
Responding to: Cornell's disciplinary response to the Chi Phi allegations was inadequate.
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
Vink expressly criticizes Cornell's response, while contrasting it with discipline imposed on student protesters.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Cornell University
Did Cornell adequately discipline the students named in the Cornell 7 lawsuit?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“For me, it feels very much like they were gaslighting.”Read statement
Cornell University
“Any suggestion that the university did not impose consequential punishments for those involved is false.”Read statement
“The University cannot expect the student body to treat the campus disciplinary process as legitimate”Read statement