Cornell Won't, We Will
Editorial board
“Cornell has failed to protect its students.”
Source and context
Original text
About this source
The editorial board criticizes Cornell's response to the Chi Phi allegations and calls for more information about its suspension standards and the complainant's Title IX outcome.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The editorial followed a civil complaint alleging a 2024 sexual assault at Chi Phi and criticizing Cornell's response.
After the quotation
The board asked Cornell to explain when sexual-assault suspensions can end and to share the outcome of the complainant's Title IX investigation with her.
How this statement is classified
Responding to: Cornell's disciplinary response to the Chi Phi allegations was inadequate.
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The editorial board judges Cornell's response inadequate and demands more accountability.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Cornell University
Did Cornell adequately discipline the students named in the Cornell 7 lawsuit?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“For me, it feels very much like they were gaslighting.”Read statement
Cornell University
“Any suggestion that the university did not impose consequential punishments for those involved is false.”Read statement
“The University cannot expect the student body to treat the campus disciplinary process as legitimate”Read statement