Chelsea Byers says Flock broke West Hollywood's trust

West Hollywood City Council member

“I don’t know how we recover from that sense of trust violated in this moment, And we keep hearing that it’s going to work and they’re putting safeguards in place, but ultimately, it’s up to us as a city to put some of these safeguards in place, and we’re doing our best to understand it. And I can’t give the sense of trust back to the public that we’ve done our due diligence in this moment here.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)West Hollywood keeps Flock Safety camerasByers' remarks about trust in Flock, midway through the article
Open source (opens in a new tab)"We Kicked Everybody Out": West Hollywood Keeps Flock Cameras in 3-2 VoteNear the top of the article, after the description of the vote

Source and context

Reporting

West Hollywood keeps Flock Safety cameras (opens in a new tab)Byers' remarks about trust in Flock, midway through the article

About this source

Beverly Press report on the West Hollywood City Council's 3-2 vote on March 16, 2026, to continue its contract with Flock Safety.

Reporting

"We Kicked Everybody Out": West Hollywood Keeps Flock Cameras in 3-2 Vote (opens in a new tab)Near the top of the article, after the description of the vote

About this source

WEHOonline report on the West Hollywood City Council meeting of March 16, 2026, at which the council kept its Flock Safety cameras on a 3-2 vote.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

At its March 16, 2026, meeting the West Hollywood City Council weighed whether to keep its Flock Safety cameras after reports and a lawsuit alleging the company shared data with federal immigration agents. Beverly Press reported that Byers voiced particular concern about whether to trust Flock.

After the quotation

The council kept the contract on a 3-2 vote, with Byers and John Erickson dissenting, and directed staff to return with stricter limits on data sharing. WEHOonline's account of the meeting quotes Byers saying, "I cannot support ongoing relationships with Flock at this time."

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Byers said she did not know how the city could recover the trust that had been violated, voted against keeping West Hollywood's Flock contract, and in WEHOonline's account of the same meeting said she could not support ongoing relationships with Flock at this time. Support for ending a city's Flock contract is labeled Condemned.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement