Madrigal calls Flock cameras extremely effective when used appropriately

Racine County Sheriff's Office captain and Republican candidate for Racine County sheriff

“When used appropriately, they are extremely effective, Which is no different than any other piece of technology. It needs to be used effectively, it needs to be used appropriately with guidelines set to how it can and cannot be used.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Racine County sheriff race, Republicans on primary ballotSection 'What are their opinions on Flock cameras?'

Source and context

Reporting

Racine County sheriff race, Republicans on primary ballot (opens in a new tab)Section 'What are their opinions on Flock cameras?'

About this source

FOX6 News Milwaukee profile of the two Republican candidates for Racine County sheriff on the eve of the Aug. 11, 2026 primary.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

FOX6 News asked the two Republican sheriff candidates about Flock cameras, noting four cases of Flock misuse in Racine County since late May 2026, two in the sheriff's office and two in the Racine Police Department.

After the quotation

FOX6 reported that her primary opponent Henry Perez agreed with her and added that the system needs monitoring so it is not abused.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate cameras such as Flock should exist and be used. Asked about Flock after local misuse cases, Madrigal calls the cameras extremely effective when used appropriately and treats them like any other police technology that needs usage guidelines. That supports keeping them, matching how comparable 'valuable when used properly' remarks are labeled, so Defended or excused fits.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement