Martínez Lott opposes Flock renewal unless Fresno adds safeguards
Candidate for Fresno City Council, District 7
“I oppose renewing Flock cameras unless the City earns the public’s trust through transparency and strong safeguards for our constitutional rights The City and Police Department failed to fully engage residents before entering a three-year contract that created a new level of public surveillance. As abuses of this technology have been exposed across the country and in our state, cities have terminated Flock contracts over privacy, oversight, and misuse concerns.”
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
A Fresno Bee Reality Check article that asked both Fresno City Council District 7 candidates for their positions on the city's Flock camera contract.
Before the quotation
The Fresno Bee asked both District 7 candidates about Fresno police use of Flock cameras. The city's three-year contract, which expires in 2026, cost roughly $1.5 million and covers about 70 cameras.
After the quotation
She said the public deserves a full account of every surveillance technology Fresno police use before any extension, and that if the city cannot earn that trust it should invest the $1.5 million in Advance Peace and other community crime-reduction programs.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Martínez Lott opposes renewing Fresno's Flock contract unless the city earns public trust through transparency and strong safeguards. Opposition that depends on an express condition is Mixed or conditional.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety

Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement