Delzingaro calls for clear rules on Lynchburg's Flock data
Democratic candidate for Lynchburg City Council, Lynchburg Better Together slate
“LPD has a hard job, and we want our officers to have effective tools to do that job well, But when any technology collects and stores information, people deserve to understand the rules around that — who can access the data, how long it is kept, how it is shared, and how misuse is prevented.”
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Campaign statement from the Lynchburg Better Together slate of Lynchburg City Council candidates, issued after the Lynchburg Police Department paused its fixed Flock cameras pending an independent review.
Before the quotation
The Lynchburg Police Department announced it would temporarily pause the city's fifteen fixed Flock license-plate cameras while an independent third-party review is completed. The Lynchburg Better Together slate of City Council candidates released a statement in response.
After the quotation
The slate said it would support four steps: a transparent independent review, public release of the Flock contract, a public hearing and a five-year public safety technology plan with criteria for renewing, expanding, limiting or discontinuing the program.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Delzingaro said police should have effective tools but that people deserve clear rules on data access, retention, sharing and misuse. That accepts the tools on the condition of stated rules, so Mixed or conditional fits.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement