Aquiles La Grave questions Boulder's Flock contract in a sanctuary city

Entrepreneur and candidate for mayor of Boulder

“How does the city explain being a sanctuary city at the same time as having AI-assisted mass surveillance with a company that has, at best, a checkered track record of sharing that information with the very agencies that we’re trying to protect our immigrants from? Council feels comfortable enough with being told by the city manager that that’s an administrative contract, and therefore, they have no say in it.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Boulder entrepreneur Aquiles La Grave announces run for mayorParagraphs on the city's Flock Safety contract, after the airport discussion

Source and context

Reporting

Boulder entrepreneur Aquiles La Grave announces run for mayor (opens in a new tab)Paragraphs on the city's Flock Safety contract, after the airport discussion

About this source

Boulder Reporting Lab article on Aquiles La Grave's campaign for mayor of Boulder, based on an interview with the candidate.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Boulder Reporting Lab reported that La Grave said the council should have exercised greater control over the city's contract with Flock Safety, which provides Boulder's license-plate reader cameras, and that city staff put the contract out for competitive bidding in March after public opposition.

After the quotation

The article reports that the city manager's office is expected to select the winning bidder.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate camera systems such as Flock should exist and be used. La Grave questions how Boulder can be a sanctuary city while using AI-assisted mass surveillance from a company with a checkered record on data sharing, and faults the council for not asserting control over the contract; he criticizes the arrangement and seeks oversight without calling to end the cameras.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement