Francesca Hong's campaign plan backs a ban on AI camera tools like Flock

Wisconsin state representative (D) running for governor in the 2026 Democratic primary

“Every few weeks, it seems, another police officer gets caught using an AI surveillance system to spy on an ex-girlfriend or abortion patient. Some uses of AI are dangerous encroachments on our civil rights. Fran supports a ban on the highest-risk AI tools available to law enforcement: live facial recognition in public spaces, individual-level risk scoring for pretrial detention and sentencing, AI-powered camera tools like Flock, and social media surveillance services.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Firewall: Francesca Hong's Plan for Protecting Privacy in an AI WorldSection headed Stop Police Surveillance Abuse
Open source (opens in a new tab)Democratic candidates for Wisconsin governor on the use of Flock cameras and police surveillanceCandidate responses in the full article, under each candidate's name

Source and context

Official statement

Firewall: Francesca Hong's Plan for Protecting Privacy in an AI World (opens in a new tab)Section headed Stop Police Surveillance Abuse

About this source

Policy page on Francesca Hong's 2026 campaign website for Wisconsin governor, setting out her proposals on AI, privacy and police surveillance.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Democratic candidates for Wisconsin governor on the use of Flock cameras and police surveillance (opens in a new tab)Candidate responses in the full article, under each candidate's name

About this source

Milwaukee Courier roundup of written responses from Democratic candidates for Wisconsin governor on Flock cameras and police surveillance, published before the August 2026 primary.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Hong's campaign published a plan called Firewall on AI and privacy, with a section on AI and law enforcement.

After the quotation

The plan also says any algorithm-based or AI system used in policing should be open-source, independently audited and not controlled by a private vendor. The Milwaukee Courier cited the section in a July 2026 roundup of the Democratic candidates' positions on Flock cameras.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate camera systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Hong's campaign plan says she supports a ban on AI-powered camera tools like Flock among the highest-risk AI tools available to police, which is a call to end their use rather than to limit it.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement