David Dillie calls for control over Flock cameras

Democratic candidate for Georgia House District 161

“Hopefully we can get control of these Flock cameras. I understand privacy concerns When I leave my neighborhood they are following me. There has got to be a line between safety and now violating people’s rights.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Flock cameras, data centers take center stage at Savannah candidate town hallDillie's remarks in the middle of the article

Source and context

Reporting

Flock cameras, data centers take center stage at Savannah candidate town hall (opens in a new tab)Dillie's remarks in the middle of the article

About this source

WTOC report on a Savannah Indivisible candidate forum covering data centers and Flock cameras.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Dillie spoke at the Focus on the Future forum hosted by Savannah Indivisible, where candidates and state leaders took questions on data centers, Flock cameras and other issues.

After the quotation

Dillie faces incumbent Republican Rep. Bill Hitchens in the Nov. 3 general election.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate readers such as Flock should exist and be used. Dillie said he hopes to get control of Flock cameras and that there must be a line between safety and violating people's rights. We used Mixed or conditional because he calls for limits and does not call for removing the cameras.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement