Raychel Proudie calls for felony penalties for Flock camera misuse

Missouri state representative (D) and candidate for Missouri Senate District 14

“It's such a huge violation of public trust I would love to see that to be a felony.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Missouri state Rep. Proudie wants to punish people who misuse Flock cameras · St. Louis Public RadioFifth paragraph of the article accompanying the podcast episode

Source and context

Reporting

Missouri state Rep. Proudie wants to punish people who misuse Flock cameras (opens in a new tab) · St. Louis Public RadioFifth paragraph of the article accompanying the podcast episode

About this source

St. Louis Public Radio article accompanying a Politically Speaking podcast episode with Missouri state Rep. Raychel Proudie.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

St. Louis Public Radio reported that Flock cameras drew bipartisan criticism in Missouri after a St. Charles County Police Department employee used the technology for a non-law enforcement purpose. Proudie said she worries bad actors could use the devices to stalk people.

After the quotation

Proudie made the remarks on the station's Politically Speaking podcast after winning the Democratic primary for the 14th Senate District. She faces Republican Vernon Norman in November.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate readers such as Flock should exist and be used. Proudie called for felony penalties for people who misuse Flock cameras, which targets abuse of the systems rather than the systems themselves, so Mixed or conditional fits.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement