Catherine Stefani calls for stronger Flock safeguards

California Assembly member (D) running for reelection in District 19

“abuses make clear that we need stronger safeguards, oversight, and consequences for misuse.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)We asked candidates if San Francisco should keep Flock surveillanceCandidate responses under support, opposition, and no position

Source and context

Interview

We asked candidates if San Francisco should keep Flock surveillance (opens in a new tab)Candidate responses under support, opposition, and no position

About this source

The San Francisco Standard asked local candidates whether the city should renew its Flock contract and recorded their differing answers.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The San Francisco Standard asked candidates whether the city should renew its Flock contract. A staff member said Stefani was declining to answer that question, but in a statement she called Flock cameras a "valuable tool in stopping some of our most heinous crimes," citing a report of police using the technology to find a trafficked teenager.

After the quotation

The Standard listed Stefani among the candidates with no position on renewing San Francisco's contract.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Stefani called Flock cameras a valuable tool against serious crimes but said abuses show the need for stronger safeguards, oversight and consequences for misuse. Support for the tool paired with a call for new limits fits Mixed or conditional.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement