Castro urges federal safeguards for Flock camera data
U.S. representative from Texas
“National security experts agree that Congress must begin developing regulation and built-in protections for Americans.”
Source and context
Original post
About this source
First post in a two-post Bluesky thread. Castro says agency handling of Flock data is insecure.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Original post
About this source
Second post in Castro's thread. He calls for congressional regulation and built-in protections.
Before the quotation
In a two-post Bluesky thread dated September 3, Castro addressed the security of Flock camera records.
After the quotation
He warned of foreign exploitation and called for congressional regulation and built-in protections.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
Calls for tighter data security rules while leaving networked cameras in place.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement