Blackburn backs Flock camera use with a privacy limit

U.S. senator from Tennessee and Republican candidate for governor

“Yes, I do.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Tennessee's political winds appear to be shifting on license plate readersParagraphs quoting Blackburn's candidate questionnaire answer and later Franklin remarks

Source and context

Reporting

Tennessee's political winds appear to be shifting on license plate readers (opens in a new tab)Paragraphs quoting Blackburn's candidate questionnaire answer and later Franklin remarks

About this source

Full reprint of Steven Hale's Nashville Banner reporting under Creative Commons. It gives Blackburn's direct questionnaire answer and her later distinction between reading a plate and continuous surveillance.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The Nashville Banner asked Blackburn whether she supported license-plate readers, Flock cameras and other automated surveillance.

After the quotation

At a later public event, she said a plate reader differs from 24-hour surveillance.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Her direct answer supports Flock camera use, while her later remarks distinguish it from continuous surveillance.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Flock Safety
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement