Hawley wants police cameras with statutory privacy limits

U.S. senator and Senate Judiciary subcommittee chair

“All that said, I want police to have the tools they need. Cameras can help recover stolen cars, find missing children, and catch fleeing criminals.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Senator Hawley explains his Flock surveillance investigationParagraphs beginning All that said and I hope the company

Source and context

Official statement

Senator Hawley explains his Flock surveillance investigation (opens in a new tab)Paragraphs beginning All that said and I hope the company

About this source

Hawley supports police access to useful cameras while calling for statutory privacy rules on data collection, search, and retention.

Before the quotation

Hawley described the reach of Flock's camera network and cases in which officers allegedly misused access.

After the quotation

He said Congress should write lasting protections governing data collection, retention, searches and sales rather than rely on company policies.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Hawley defends the investigative utility of cameras while criticizing unrestricted, searchable movement records. He calls for legal safeguards rather than an outright ban.

Recorded on
Published here
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement