Steube proposes warrants for federal ALPR access
U.S. representative
“Americans should not be tracked everywhere they drive without a warrant.”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Rep. Steube introduces FLAFO Act to rein in warrantless Flock surveillanceAnnouncement and Steube quotation
Source and context
Official statement
Rep. Steube introduces FLAFO Act to rein in warrantless Flock surveillance (opens in a new tab)Announcement and Steube quotation
About this source
Steube describes a judicial-warrant rule for federal access to networked ALPR systems.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Steube introduced the FLAFO Act in the U.S. House.
After the quotation
His proposal also ties some federal grants to similar state and local safeguards.
How this statement is classified
Mixed or conditional
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
A warrant requirement permits narrower use rather than banning the networks outright.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement