Massie proposes cutting federal camera funding
U.S. representative from Kentucky
“Federal taxpayers should not be forced to fund the surveillance state.”
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Bill announcement, funding scope, exceptions, and sponsor quotations
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Massie introduced the Flock-Off Act with Eric Burlison.
After the quotation
The bill restricts federal funding. It does not ban every state or local camera system.
How this statement is classified
Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Massie said federal taxpayers should not be forced to fund the surveillance state and proposed cutting federal funding for the readers, with border and toll exceptions. A funding cut that leaves other uses open fits Mixed or conditional.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”Read statement
“Tennesseans should be free from a surveillance state.”Read statement
“We need to restore real limits, real oversight, and real due process.”Read statement