Sébastien Bubeck denies OpenAI's authorship talks with Alpöge were closed
Sébastien BubeckOpenAI participant replying directly to Alpöge
Rejects Alpöge's description of closed negotiations and says the team was willing to keep discussing alternatives.
Responding to
Alpöge says his exclusion appeared to be a settled condition of the proposed collaboration.
“nothing at all was locked”
Original post
Where this statement fits
Did OpenAI improperly pressure mathematicians over authorship and credit?
Tristan Buckmaster describes pressure over authorship and publication during discussions about competing AI-assisted mathematics results. Sébastien Bubeck disputes that characterization and says the proposed authorship concerned OpenAI's own proof. His apology for career-related wording does not settle the disagreement. Researchers and commentators divide over whether the negotiations were appropriate, while raising a separate dispute about the treatment of unpublished user research.
Source and context
Original post
About this source
Direct reply to Alpöge; says negotiations remained open and further discussions were possible.
Before the quotation
Alpöge says the conversation made him believe the terms were settled.
After the quotation
This reply does not resolve the disagreement about whether the proposed exclusion was appropriate.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Direct denial of the characterization that the outcome was predetermined.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Levent Alpöge
More from this case
Read the full caseAGMAI calls OpenAI's release a first step, not an endorsement
Advisory Group on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
“AGMAI’s advisory role should not be interpreted as a judgment of the impact of these results or an endorsement of the process by which OpenAI obtained them.”Read statement
OpenAI describes steps to improve mathematical disclosures
OpenAI
“We will continue to act on feedback from the community and update our standards for future disclosures of major scientific advancements.”Read statement
AGMAI opposes using mathematical releases as marketing
Advisory Group on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
“We strongly recommend that AI labs refrain from treating the release of mathematical results as marketing vehicles to promote their models”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Sébastien Bubeck denies OpenAI's authorship talks with Alpöge were closed
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/288-rejects-alp%C3%B6ge-s-description-of-closed-negotiations-and
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Sébastien Bubeck denies OpenAI's authorship talks with Alpöge were closed". First published: 2026-09-10. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/288-rejects-alp%C3%B6ge-s-description-of-closed-negotiations-and