Chaz Molder rejected Flock-style cameras as government overreach during his congressional campaign

2026 Democratic candidate for U.S. House in Tennessee's 5th district

“That kind of big government overreach has no place in our country or Tennessee.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Flock camera backlash adds fuel to midterm anti-AI frenzyCandidate statement from Chaz Molder and El-Sayed campaign video description

Source and context

Reporting

Flock camera backlash adds fuel to midterm anti-AI frenzy (opens in a new tab)Candidate statement from Chaz Molder and El-Sayed campaign video description

About this source

Candidate statement from Chaz Molder and El-Sayed campaign video description

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Molder addressed Flock cameras as their use became a campaign issue.

After the quotation

He did not spell out a bill or implementation plan in the quoted statement.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

Case context: Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Molder called Flock-style cameras big government overreach with no place in the country or Tennessee. Rejecting the cameras outright, without proposing limits, fits Condemned.

Recorded on
Published here
A close view of a green Flock Safety automated license-plate reader mounted beside a street.
Credit: Bruxton

More from this case

Read the full case

Don Kissick

“Ohioans should not have their movements routinely tracked, photographed, and stored simply for driving on public roads.”
Read statement