Thomas Wolf calls OpenAI's pressure on mathematicians a marketing game

Thomas WolfPersonal public response

Criticizes the reported pressure and attempts to control scientific communication.

Responding to

OpenAI improperly pressured the researchers over authorship and publication of the mathematical results.

“marketing games hurtful for the real scientific community”

Original post

Read the original post (opens in a new tab)Thomas Wolf criticizes the reported handling of researchers and asks to hear both sides
WIRED illustration for the OpenAI, Anthropic, and mathematics credit dispute.

Where this statement fits

Did OpenAI improperly pressure mathematicians over authorship and credit?

Tristan Buckmaster describes pressure over authorship and publication during discussions about competing AI-assisted mathematics results. Sébastien Bubeck disputes that characterization and says the proposed authorship concerned OpenAI's own proof. His apology for career-related wording does not settle the disagreement. Researchers and commentators divide over whether the negotiations were appropriate, while raising a separate dispute about the treatment of unpublished user research.

Read the full case

Case updates

Keep up with the Buckmaster and OpenAI credit dispute

We'll email you if Buckmaster, Bubeck or OpenAI add to their accounts, or if OpenAI's new mathematics advisory group issues advice.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original post

Thomas Wolf criticizes the reported handling of researchers and asks to hear both sides (opens in a new tab)

About this source

Full thread includes his 06:58:39Z follow-up urging readers to wait for the other side's account.

Before the quotation

Responds to Buckmaster's initial account before Bubeck's detailed rebuttal.

After the quotation

Nine minutes later he urges readers to wait and hear the other side; that qualification is part of this position.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Condemnation of the reported conduct, qualified by an explicit request to hear the other account.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
OpenAI

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Thomas Wolf, Thomas Wolf calls OpenAI's pressure on mathematicians a marketing gameDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Thomas Wolf calls OpenAI's pressure on mathematicians a marketing game
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/286-criticizes-the-reported-pressure-and-attempts-to-control

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Thomas Wolf calls OpenAI's pressure on mathematicians a marketing game". First published: 2026-09-10. Last updated: 2026-09-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/286-criticizes-the-reported-pressure-and-attempts-to-control