Rep. Adam Smith says Congress and the public have yet to see evidence for the President's determinations about the boats
Adam SmithRanking Member of the House Armed Services Committee, in a statement marking one year of the campaign
In a September 2 statement marking one year of the campaign, Smith said Congress and the American people "have yet to see any evidence" supporting the President's determinations about the vessels, and that in his over 20 years on the committee he had never seen "such a staggering lack of transparency" from an administration.
“Congress and the American people have yet to see any evidence to support the president’s unilateral determinations that these vessels, or the activities of those on board, warrant lethal military force rather than law enforcement-led interdiction. … Never before in my over 20 years on this committee have I seen such a staggering lack of transparency on behalf of an administration and DoD to meaningfully inform Congress of the use of lethal military force.”
Official statement
Where this statement fits
Was the U.S. military's September 19 Caribbean boat strike justified by evidence of narcotics trafficking?
On September 19, 2026, U.S. Southern Command announced that Joint Task Force Western Hemisphere had struck a go-fast vessel in the Caribbean Sea and killed four people it called "narco-terrorists". The command said "Confirmed intelligence revealed the vessel's active involvement in narco-trafficking". According to The Associated Press, the military did not provide evidence that the vessel was carrying drugs. On September 20, U.N. Special Rapporteur Ben Saul posted a briefing note concluding that U.S. strikes on alleged drug boats since September 2025 amount to "serial extrajudicial killings" and that there are "reasonable grounds to believe" the 68 attacks he counted through August 2026 "constituted crimes against humanity of murder". White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said on September 22 that the strikes have been "against designated narcoterrorists". The dispute is whether the intelligence Southern Command cites, which it did not release with its announcement, justified the September 19 strike.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Statement from Rep. Adam Smith, ranking member of the House Armed Services Committee, marking one year since what he calls the administration's unauthorized campaign of lethal boat strikes. It says Congress and the American people have not seen evidence for the President's determinations about the vessels.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Smith released the statement on September 2, 2026, 17 days before the September 19 strike. It marks one year since what he calls the administration's unauthorized campaign of lethal military strikes on boats in the Southern Command area of responsibility.
After the quotation
Smith also wrote that it remains unclear whether the operations have made any real difference in stopping illegal drugs from reaching the United States, and that the administration has failed to publicly provide the costs of the operations in dollars and readiness.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Measured against the campaign the September 19 strike belongs to and the government's stated basis that those aboard are narcotraffickers, Smith says no evidence has been shown to support the President's determinations about the vessels and criticizes the campaign as unauthorized. That criticizes the conduct itself instead of disputing a label.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseRachel VanLandingham says international condemnation makes it clearer the boat strikes are unlawful
“For the vast majority of service members, except perhaps the senior-most commanders, there is both no safe recourse for them to disobey orders related to the illegal boat strikes and at the same time, there is no exposure to criminal liability for them either … Yes, the growing international condemnation makes it clearer that these strikes are unlawful, but doesn’t overcome the White House’s own legal sanitization process and doesn’t create a legal duty for any service member to disobey their boat strike-related orders”Read statement
Southern Command tells Task & Purpose its operations have been conducted lawfully
U.S. Southern Command
“have been conducted lawfully, fully complying with the law of armed conflict”Read statement
Chuy Garcia calls the Caribbean and Pacific boat strikes illegal extrajudicial killings
“Donald Trump is dropping bombs across the Caribbean and Pacific in blatant violation of the law and of fundamental human rights … This has done nothing to stop the flow of drugs or to make Americans safer. Instead, it has left hundreds dead, families devastated, and communities in fear. Let us call these attacks what they are: illegal extrajudicial killings.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Rep. Adam Smith says Congress and the public have yet to see evidence for the President's determinations about the boats
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/2737-in-a-september-2-statement-marking-one-year
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Rep. Adam Smith says Congress and the public have yet to see evidence for the President's determinations about the boats". First published: 2026-09-26. Last updated: 2026-09-26. https://disputeindex.com/events/2737-in-a-september-2-statement-marking-one-year