Hegseth says U.S. counter-cartel efforts are 100 percent lawful under the laws of armed conflict
Secretary of War, speaking at an Americas Counter Cartel Coalition conference in Panama City
“It's now nearly one year since the launch of Operation Southern Spear, the first time in history that the Department of War launched a sustained military campaign against US designated terrorist organizations in our shared hemisphere. And it has been a resounding success thus far. … the international left, along with their enabling left-wing media, is plotting to unlawfully assert International Criminal Court jurisdiction over US and partner military personnel and operations. To be clear, there is no legitimate basis for the ICC's lawless power grab that they will entertain anywhere they can in the world. Our efforts in this effort are 100 percent lawful under the laws of armed conflict.”
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Department of War transcript of Secretary Hegseth's remarks in Panama. The remarks refer to Operation Southern Spear and to International Criminal Court jurisdiction over U.S. military operations.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Reporting
About this source
Al Jazeera report on Hegseth's August 12 speech in Panama. It reads his remarks as covering U.S. strikes on alleged drug boats.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Hegseth spoke on August 12, 2026, more than five weeks before the September 19 strike. He said the operation's critics include "the fake news media", which "has tried to discredit and delegitimize Operation Southern Spear".
After the quotation
His remarks concern the campaign as a whole and its lawfulness, not the evidence for any single strike. He also said U.S. forces had seen "record drops in movements of narco vessels across major maritime corridors".
How this statement is classified
Case context: Was the U.S. military's September 19 Caribbean boat strike justified by evidence of narcotics trafficking?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
Measured against the campaign the September 19 strike belongs to and its legal basis, Hegseth says the campaign is lawful under the laws of armed conflict and rejects outside jurisdiction over it, which defends the legal premise for the strikes.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Was the U.S. military's September 19 Caribbean boat strike justified by evidence of narcotics trafficking?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“Donald Trump is dropping bombs across the Caribbean and Pacific in blatant violation of the law and of fundamental human rights … This has done nothing to stop the flow of drugs or to make Americans safer. Instead, it has left hundreds dead, families devastated, and communities in fear. Let us call these attacks what they are: illegal extrajudicial killings.”Read statement
“The cartels are the ISIS of the Western Hemisphere, not good people. They're enemies at war with civilization, using murder, rape, torture, and extortion as instruments of terror. … they should be killed, exiled, or detained as enemy combatants without the possibility of release, which is what we're doing. To that end, the United States has carried out dozens of strikes on cartel drug boats, destroying 97% of the drugs coming into the ocean and sea.”Read statement
“All of these decisive strikes have been against designated narcoterrorists bringing deadly poison to our shores, and the President will continue to use every element of American power to stop drugs from flooding into our country and to bring those responsible to justice”Read statement