Senate vote: Nay on H.Con.Res. 89 (Iran war powers)
John CornynU.S. Senator, Texas
John Cornyn voted nay on H.Con.Res. 89, a vote against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran.
“On the Concurrent Resolution H.Con.Res. 89: A concurrent resolution directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”
Official statement
Other statements by John Cornyn in this case
- Statement on U.S. strikes on IranEarlier: Defended or excused
- Senate vote: Nay on H.Con.Res. 86 (Iran war powers)Earlier: Defended or excused
Where this statement fits
Do they support the war in Iran?
An issue tracker recording where members of Congress and 2026 congressional candidates stand on continued U.S. military operations against Iran, based on their votes, campaign statements, and public remarks.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Official Senate roll call on H.Con.Res. 89, a concurrent resolution directing the President under section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran. Rejected 49-50 on September 24, 2026. Fetterman was the only Democratic nay; Republicans Collins, Murkowski, Paul and Tillis voted yea; Alsobrooks did not vote.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
On September 24, 2026, the Senate voted on H.Con.Res. 89, a concurrent resolution directing the President under section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution to remove U.S. Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran. The House had adopted the resolution 214-208 on July 23, 2026. The Senate rejected it 49-50.
After the quotation
Because H.Con.Res. 89 is a concurrent resolution, it would not have been presented to the President even if it had passed the Senate.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Voted against directing the removal of U.S. forces from unauthorized hostilities with Iran, a vote to let U.S. involvement continue without congressional authorization.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseJen Mazzuckelli says she would vote for an Iran war powers resolution
“Yes, I would absolutely support and vote for a war powers resolution ... I also would work to get Congress to draft and pass legislation that would narrow and specify circumstances in which the President could initiate military action without Congressional approval.”Read statement
Carl Lambrecht says he supports the Iran war because Iran should not have a nuclear bomb
“Iran should not have a nuclear bomb. Therefore I support the war.”Read statement
Houston Brignano's campaign says he would vote against an Iran war powers resolution
“On a war powers resolution directing the removal of U.S. forces from hostilities against Iran: Houston would vote no.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Senate vote: Nay on H.Con.Res. 89 (Iran war powers)
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/2450-john-cornyn-voted-nay-on-h-con-res
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Senate vote: Nay on H.Con.Res. 89 (Iran war powers)". First published: 2026-09-25. Last updated: 2026-09-25. https://disputeindex.com/events/2450-john-cornyn-voted-nay-on-h-con-res